From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 486 invoked by alias); 11 Jan 2014 15:59:28 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 466 invoked by uid 89); 11 Jan 2014 15:59:27 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 X-Spam-User: qpsmtpd, 2 recipients X-HELO: mail-wg0-f53.google.com Received: from mail-wg0-f53.google.com (HELO mail-wg0-f53.google.com) (74.125.82.53) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with (AES128-SHA encrypted) ESMTPS; Sat, 11 Jan 2014 15:59:26 +0000 Received: by mail-wg0-f53.google.com with SMTP id k14so5177295wgh.20 for ; Sat, 11 Jan 2014 07:59:23 -0800 (PST) X-Received: by 10.180.211.161 with SMTP id nd1mr5674587wic.41.1389455963353; Sat, 11 Jan 2014 07:59:23 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost.localdomain (arf62-1-82-237-250-248.fbx.proxad.net. [82.237.250.248]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id xl18sm8245558wib.9.2014.01.11.07.59.21 for (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Sat, 11 Jan 2014 07:59:22 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <52D16A59.3020901@gmail.com> Date: Sat, 11 Jan 2014 15:59:00 -0000 From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Fran=E7ois_Dumont?= User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:15.0) Gecko/20120829 Thunderbird/15.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Jonathan Wakely CC: "libstdc++@gcc.gnu.org" , gcc-patches Subject: Re: PR 59712 patch References: <52CF1ADB.5070901@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-SW-Source: 2014-01/txt/msg00672.txt.bz2 On 01/09/2014 11:49 PM, Jonathan Wakely wrote: > On 9 January 2014 21:55, François Dumont wrote: >> All unordered_* tests run under Linux x86_64. > Please make sure you run the entire testsuite, not just the parts that > seem relevant. > Done and no failure, ok to commit ? François