From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 14110 invoked by alias); 15 Jan 2014 19:45:36 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 13952 invoked by uid 89); 15 Jan 2014 19:45:35 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-4.2 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 X-HELO: mx1.redhat.com Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Wed, 15 Jan 2014 19:45:34 +0000 Received: from int-mx10.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx10.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.23]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id s0FJjKYE028415 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Wed, 15 Jan 2014 14:45:24 -0500 Received: from [10.10.116.16] ([10.10.116.16]) by int-mx10.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id s0FJjBZ1014919; Wed, 15 Jan 2014 14:45:14 -0500 Message-ID: <52D6E545.5000203@redhat.com> Date: Wed, 15 Jan 2014 19:45:00 -0000 From: Jason Merrill User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.2.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Paolo Carlini , "gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org" Subject: Re: [C++ Patch] PR 59270 References: <52D68522.9020002@oracle.com> In-Reply-To: <52D68522.9020002@oracle.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2014-01/txt/msg00918.txt.bz2 On 01/15/2014 07:54 AM, Paolo Carlini wrote: > It seems Ok to me, and passes testing, to > return NULL_TREE from build_value_init. Alternately, more > conservatively, we could change build_value_init_noctor to not call > build_value_init at all when ftype == error_mark_node. I think I would prefer that. I'm uncomfortable with returning NULL_TREE. Jason