From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 22194 invoked by alias); 16 Apr 2014 18:31:33 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 22185 invoked by uid 89); 16 Apr 2014 18:31:33 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-6.3 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RP_MATCHES_RCVD autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 X-HELO: moene.org Received: from moene.org (HELO moene.org) (80.101.130.238) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with (AES128-SHA encrypted) ESMTPS; Wed, 16 Apr 2014 18:31:31 +0000 Received: from localhost ([::1]) by moene.org with esmtp (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1WaUcE-0003h0-Pp; Wed, 16 Apr 2014 20:31:22 +0200 Message-ID: <534ECC7A.2050206@moene.org> Date: Wed, 16 Apr 2014 18:45:00 -0000 From: Toon Moene User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Icedove/24.4.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Jakub Jelinek , DJ Delorie CC: bonzini@gnu.org, aoliva@redhat.com, Ralf.Wildenhues@gmx.de, rguenther@suse.de, gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Re: Patch ping References: <20140409130721.GK1817@tucnak.redhat.com> <201404092229.s39MTmXp015920@greed.delorie.com> <20140410055906.GP1817@tucnak.redhat.com> <201404101601.s3AG1VSv012678@greed.delorie.com> <20140414110209.GO1817@tucnak.redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <20140414110209.GO1817@tucnak.redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2014-04/txt/msg00925.txt.bz2 On 04/14/2014 01:02 PM, Jakub Jelinek wrote: > On Thu, Apr 10, 2014 at 12:01:31PM -0400, DJ Delorie wrote: > So, now that 4.9 has branched, are both patches ok for trunk, or just the > first one? The first one fixes --with-build-config=bootstrap-ubsan > fully and --with-build-config=bootstrap-asan partially, the second one > --with-build-config=bootstrap-asan fully. Now that the 4.9 branch happened, I sincerely hope this goes in (both parts of it) - my bootstrap-asan run this morning still failed. I'm quite sure regular asan/ubsan bootstraps on various platforms (mine is only the most common x86-64 one) would be helpful to find bugs in the compilers' frontends, middle end and libraries ... Kind regards, -- Toon Moene - e-mail: toon@moene.org - phone: +31 346 214290 Saturnushof 14, 3738 XG Maartensdijk, The Netherlands At home: http://moene.org/~toon/; weather: http://moene.org/~hirlam/ Progress of GNU Fortran: http://gcc.gnu.org/wiki/GFortran#news