From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 23989 invoked by alias); 8 May 2014 13:32:56 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 23971 invoked by uid 89); 8 May 2014 13:32:56 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-1.6 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 X-Spam-User: qpsmtpd, 3 recipients X-HELO: mx1.redhat.com Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Thu, 08 May 2014 13:32:55 +0000 Received: from int-mx01.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx01.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.11]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id s48DWpaX027523 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Thu, 8 May 2014 09:32:51 -0400 Received: from stumpy.slc.redhat.com (ovpn-113-56.phx2.redhat.com [10.3.113.56]) by int-mx01.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id s48DWodK015517; Thu, 8 May 2014 09:32:50 -0400 Message-ID: <536B8782.4040007@redhat.com> Date: Thu, 08 May 2014 13:32:00 -0000 From: Jeff Law User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.4.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Jonathan Wakely , John Marino CC: "Joseph S. Myers" , gcc-patches , Gerald Pfeifer , "manu at gcc dot gnu.org" , "Eric Botcazou (gnu.org)" Subject: Re: Contributing new gcc targets: i386-*-dragonfly and x86-64-*-dragonfly References: <5352D100.9040108@marino.st> <5362DC9B.8090709@marino.st> <5363E0F4.4060900@marino.st> <53649694.6050508@marino.st> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2014-05/txt/msg00484.txt.bz2 On 05/08/14 07:14, Jonathan Wakely wrote: > > Ian's approved the libiberty.h change, Joseph's approved the stddef.h > change, I've approved the libstdc++ parts. > > IIUC it still needs explicit approval for the rest, e.g. trivial > adjustments to configuration stuff in libitm and libcilkrts. Are there > specific maintainers for those libs? > > The rest look obvious to me, it doesn't touch other targets at all > except for one bit that replaces a check for __FreeBSD__ >= 7 with a > grep for the dl_iterate_phdr function in a system header, which only > affects FreeBSD and looks OK to me. > > Anyone willing to give it an overall approval? I'll take a look at the rest. I mostly wanted someone else to deal with stddef.h :-) jeff