From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 4853 invoked by alias); 20 May 2014 13:27:01 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 4843 invoked by uid 89); 20 May 2014 13:27:01 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-3.7 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 X-HELO: userp1040.oracle.com Received: from userp1040.oracle.com (HELO userp1040.oracle.com) (156.151.31.81) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with (AES256-SHA encrypted) ESMTPS; Tue, 20 May 2014 13:27:00 +0000 Received: from acsinet21.oracle.com (acsinet21.oracle.com [141.146.126.237]) by userp1040.oracle.com (Sentrion-MTA-4.3.2/Sentrion-MTA-4.3.2) with ESMTP id s4KDQv7P028265 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Tue, 20 May 2014 13:26:58 GMT Received: from aserz7022.oracle.com (aserz7022.oracle.com [141.146.126.231]) by acsinet21.oracle.com (8.14.4+Sun/8.14.4) with ESMTP id s4KDQucn012532 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Tue, 20 May 2014 13:26:57 GMT Received: from abhmp0019.oracle.com (abhmp0019.oracle.com [141.146.116.25]) by aserz7022.oracle.com (8.14.4+Sun/8.14.4) with ESMTP id s4KDQuZN025625; Tue, 20 May 2014 13:26:56 GMT Received: from [192.168.1.4] (/79.33.95.17) by default (Oracle Beehive Gateway v4.0) with ESMTP ; Tue, 20 May 2014 06:26:56 -0700 Message-ID: <537B5793.4070207@oracle.com> Date: Tue, 20 May 2014 13:27:00 -0000 From: Paolo Carlini User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.5.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org" CC: Jason Merrill Subject: [Ping] [C++ Patch] PR 60373 References: <53716519.8010802@oracle.com> In-Reply-To: <53716519.8010802@oracle.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2014-05/txt/msg01618.txt.bz2 Hi, On 05/13/2014 02:19 AM, Paolo Carlini wrote: > Hi, > > in this issue Marc noticed that the warning for ignored attribute > visibility is truncated when the previous declaration belongs to a > system header. Luckily the problem can be neatly fixed because it's > just a consequence of not using warning_at + inform, as we should > anyway. The other hunk in the patch tweaks the only other remaining > warning_at pair I found in the file, should be a rather benign one, > but better adjusting it too. > > Tested x86_64-linux. Ping rather early because this one should be rather straightforward... Thanks! Paolo.