From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 993 invoked by alias); 5 Jun 2014 17:18:46 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 968 invoked by uid 89); 5 Jun 2014 17:18:45 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-4.2 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 X-HELO: mx1.redhat.com Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Thu, 05 Jun 2014 17:18:44 +0000 Received: from int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.22]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id s55HIgDh024418 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Thu, 5 Jun 2014 13:18:42 -0400 Received: from [10.10.116.18] ([10.10.116.18]) by int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id s55HIfeH019141; Thu, 5 Jun 2014 13:18:42 -0400 Message-ID: <5390A671.7070701@redhat.com> Date: Thu, 05 Jun 2014 17:18:00 -0000 From: Jason Merrill User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.5.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Richard Biener , Paolo Carlini CC: "gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org" Subject: Re: [C++ RFH] PR 56961 References: <539069C6.1050800@oracle.com> <53906CD2.4070509@redhat.com> <53906CD7.1030200@oracle.com> <5390700D.600@oracle.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2014-06/txt/msg00502.txt.bz2 On 06/05/2014 09:35 AM, Richard Biener wrote: > I suppose it's ok to re-order side-effects lhs, rhs to rhs, lhs? Yes. Jason