From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-patches-return-370991-listarch-gcc-patches=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 28192 invoked by alias); 24 Jun 2014 15:43:11 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-patches.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 28180 invoked by uid 89); 24 Jun 2014 15:43:11 -0000
Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none
X-Virus-Found: No
X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-0.4 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD autolearn=ham version=3.3.2
X-HELO: vms173015pub.verizon.net
Received: from vms173015pub.verizon.net (HELO vms173015pub.verizon.net) (206.46.173.15) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Tue, 24 Jun 2014 15:42:40 +0000
Received: from [192.168.1.3] ([unknown] [96.244.82.171]) by vms173015.mailsrvcs.net (Sun Java(tm) System Messaging Server 7u2-7.02 32bit (built Apr 16 2009)) with ESMTPA id <0N7O00BWAJN1HE70@vms173015.mailsrvcs.net> for gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org; Tue, 24 Jun 2014 10:42:37 -0500 (CDT)
Message-id: <53A99C6D.2030001@verizon.net>
Date: Tue, 24 Jun 2014 15:43:00 -0000
From: Ed Smith-Rowland <3dw4rd@verizon.net>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.6.0
MIME-version: 1.0
To: Andrew Sutton <andrew.n.sutton@gmail.com>
Cc: gcc-patches <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>, Braden Obrzut <admin@maniacsvault.net>
Subject: Re: [c++-concepts] Fix assertion failure with cp_maybe_constrained_type_specifier
References: <53A96A06.7050304@verizon.net> <CANq5SytFKC_7r4=KMRCurDLh5d2zv2dsJD_=jRMcyALfV=B_eg@mail.gmail.com> <53A999B0.5050704@verizon.net>
In-reply-to: <53A999B0.5050704@verizon.net>
Content-type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed
Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit
X-SW-Source: 2014-06/txt/msg01911.txt.bz2

I'm not sure the warning is correct in any case...

In i386.h
------------
struct stringop_algs
{
   const enum stringop_alg unknown_size;
   const struct stringop_strategy {
     const int max;
     const enum stringop_alg alg;
     int noalign;
   } size [MAX_STRINGOP_ALGS];
};

in i386.c
-----------
static stringop_algs ix86_size_memcpy[2] = {
   {rep_prefix_1_byte, {{-1, rep_prefix_1_byte, false}}},
   {rep_prefix_1_byte, {{-1, rep_prefix_1_byte, false}}}};
static stringop_algs ix86_size_memset[2] = {
   {rep_prefix_1_byte, {{-1, rep_prefix_1_byte, false}}},
   {rep_prefix_1_byte, {{-1, rep_prefix_1_byte, false}}}};