From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 4192 invoked by alias); 15 Jul 2014 18:34:15 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 4164 invoked by uid 89); 15 Jul 2014 18:34:14 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-3.8 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 X-HELO: mx1.redhat.com Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with (AES256-GCM-SHA384 encrypted) ESMTPS; Tue, 15 Jul 2014 18:34:13 +0000 Received: from int-mx10.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx10.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.23]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id s6FIYCnH012469 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Tue, 15 Jul 2014 14:34:12 -0400 Received: from [10.10.116.16] ([10.10.116.16]) by int-mx10.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id s6FIYAHt006207; Tue, 15 Jul 2014 14:34:10 -0400 Message-ID: <53C5741F.3020503@redhat.com> Date: Tue, 15 Jul 2014 18:38:00 -0000 From: Jason Merrill User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Jan Hubicka CC: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org, rguenther@suse.de Subject: Re: Move DECL_RESULT into function_decl References: <20140715141942.GD22085@kam.mff.cuni.cz> <53C5466E.20508@redhat.com> <20140715152922.GD11265@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz> In-Reply-To: <20140715152922.GD11265@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2014-07/txt/msg01086.txt.bz2 On 07/15/2014 11:29 AM, Jan Hubicka wrote: > Yep, you are right. I was looking into this, too. I think dump_ada_template > should be moved into C++ FE somehow because it deals with C++ trees. > What would be most appropriate way to do so? I suppose we could pass a pointer to it into dump_ada_specs like we do for cpp_check. Jason