From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 16749 invoked by alias); 5 Aug 2014 14:47:55 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 16725 invoked by uid 89); 5 Aug 2014 14:47:53 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-1.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 X-HELO: na01-bn1-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com Received: from mail-bn1blp0185.outbound.protection.outlook.com (HELO na01-bn1-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com) (207.46.163.185) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with (AES256-SHA encrypted) ESMTPS; Tue, 05 Aug 2014 14:47:52 +0000 Received: from BN3PR0301CA0053.namprd03.prod.outlook.com (25.160.152.149) by BY2PR0301MB0646.namprd03.prod.outlook.com (25.160.63.139) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.995.14; Tue, 5 Aug 2014 14:47:47 +0000 Received: from BL2FFO11FD019.protection.gbl (2a01:111:f400:7c09::176) by BN3PR0301CA0053.outlook.office365.com (2a01:111:e400:401e::21) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.995.14 via Frontend Transport; Tue, 5 Aug 2014 14:47:47 +0000 Received: from az84smr01.freescale.net (192.88.158.2) by BL2FFO11FD019.mail.protection.outlook.com (10.173.161.37) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.990.10 via Frontend Transport; Tue, 5 Aug 2014 14:47:46 +0000 Received: from katy.am.freescale.net (udp115325uds.am.freescale.net [10.81.32.139]) by az84smr01.freescale.net (8.14.3/8.14.0) with ESMTP id s75ElgOX010083; Tue, 5 Aug 2014 07:47:42 -0700 Message-ID: <53E0ED78.5030109@freescale.com> Date: Tue, 05 Aug 2014 14:47:00 -0000 From: Edmar User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.24) Gecko/20111108 Fedora/3.1.16-1.fc14 Lightning/1.0b3pre Thunderbird/3.1.16 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Jakub Jelinek CC: Ulrich Weigand , David Edelsohn , "rohitarulraj@freescale.com" , "gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org" , Alan Modra Subject: Re: [RFC: Patch, PR 60102] [4.9/4.10 Regression] powerpc fp-bit ices@dwf_regno References: <201408041025.s74APFJK000841@d06av02.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com> <53DFBA16.5060409@freescale.com> <20140805081139.GV7393@tucnak.redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <20140805081139.GV7393@tucnak.redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-EOPAttributedMessage: 0 X-Forefront-Antispam-Report: CIP:192.88.158.2;CTRY:US;IPV:CAL;IPV:NLI;EFV:NLI;SFV:NSPM;SFS:(6009001)(199002)(189002)(51704005)(377454003)(54534003)(479174003)(24454002)(5423002)(377424004)(87266999)(50986999)(99396002)(65816999)(107046002)(92726001)(92566001)(54356999)(76176999)(104016003)(110136001)(74662001)(105606002)(74502001)(76482001)(85306004)(79102001)(59896001)(68736004)(77982001)(83506001)(23756003)(50466002)(81542001)(84676001)(64126003)(69596002)(64706001)(81342001)(106466001)(20776003)(33656002)(47776003)(97736001)(44976005)(19580395003)(83322001)(80316001)(6806004)(86362001)(26826002)(102836001)(19580405001)(87936001)(85852003)(36756003)(83072002)(4396001)(31966008)(46102001)(21056001)(81156004)(65956001)(80022001)(95666004)(221513003);DIR:OUT;SFP:;SCL:1;SRVR:BY2PR0301MB0646;H:az84smr01.freescale.net;FPR:;MLV:ovrnspm;PTR:InfoDomainNonexistent;MX:1;LANG:en; X-Microsoft-Antispam: BCL:0;PCL:0;RULEID: X-Forefront-PRVS: 02945962BD Received-SPF: Fail (protection.outlook.com: domain of freescale.com does not designate 192.88.158.2 as permitted sender) receiver=protection.outlook.com; client-ip=192.88.158.2; helo=az84smr01.freescale.net; Authentication-Results: spf=fail (sender IP is 192.88.158.2) smtp.mailfrom=edmar@freescale.com; X-OriginatorOrg: freescale.com X-SW-Source: 2014-08/txt/msg00360.txt.bz2 Jackub, Thanks for point this up. I apologize for the sloppiness. I fixed and committed the ChangeLogs on the branch, revision 213639 Also fixed the libgcc ChangeLog on trunk. Revision 213640 Edmar On 08/05/2014 03:11 AM, Jakub Jelinek wrote: > On Mon, Aug 04, 2014 at 11:51:34AM -0500, Edmar wrote: >> Committed on trunk, revision 213596 >> Committed on 4.9 branch, revision 213597 > Note the ChangeLog entry was grossly misformated. > I've fixed it up in gcc/ChangeLog on the trunk, but not on the branch > nor in libgcc. There should be no space before :, all lines > in ChangeLog entry should be just tab indented rather than tab + 2 spaces, > and filenames, unless they are too long, shouldn't be alone on the lines. > And testsuite entries shouldn't go into gcc/ChangeLog. > >> On 08/04/2014 05:25 AM, Ulrich Weigand wrote: >>> David Edelsohn wrote: >>>> On Fri, Aug 1, 2014 at 2:03 PM, rohitarulraj@freescale.com >>>> wrote: >>>>> [libgcc] >>>>> 2014-07-31 Rohit >>>>> * config/rs6000/linux-unwind.h (ppc_fallback_frame_state): Update >>>>> based on change in SPE high register numbers and 3 HTM registers. >>>>> >>>>> [gcc] >>>>> 2014-07-31 Rohit >>>>> * config/rs6000/rs6000.c >>>>> (rs6000_reg_names) : Add SPE high register names. >>>>> (alt_reg_names) : Likewise. >>>>> (rs6000_dwarf_register_span) : For SPE high registers, replace >>>>> dwarf register numbers with GCC hard register numbers. >>>>> (rs6000_init_dwarf_reg_sizes_extra) : Likewise. >>>>> (rs6000_dbx_register_number): For SPE high registers, return dwarf >>>>> register number for the corresponding GCC hard register number. >>>>> >>>>> * config/rs6000/rs6000.h >>>>> (FIRST_PSEUDO_REGISTER) : Update based on 32 newly added GCC hard >>>>> register numbers for SPE high registers. >>>>> (DWARF_FRAME_REGISTERS) : Likewise. >>>>> (DWARF_REG_TO_UNWIND_COLUMN) : Likewise. >>>>> (DWARF_FRAME_REGNUM) : Likewise. >>>>> (FIXED_REGISTERS) : Likewise. >>>>> (CALL_USED_REGISTERS) : Likewise. >>>>> (CALL_REALLY_USED_REGISTERS) : Likewise. >>>>> (REG_ALLOC_ORDER) : Likewise. >>>>> (enum reg_class) : Likewise. >>>>> (REG_CLASS_NAMES) : Likewise. >>>>> (REG_CLASS_CONTENTS) : Likewise. >>>>> (SPE_HIGH_REGNO_P) : New macro to identify SPE high registers. >>>>> >>>>> * gcc.target/powerpc/pr60102.c: New testcase. >>>> The patch is okay with me if Uli is satisfied. >>> Yes, this is fine with me. > Jakub > . >