From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 10233 invoked by alias); 5 Aug 2014 21:05:29 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 10222 invoked by uid 89); 5 Aug 2014 21:05:29 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 X-HELO: mx1.redhat.com Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with (AES256-GCM-SHA384 encrypted) ESMTPS; Tue, 05 Aug 2014 21:05:28 +0000 Received: from int-mx14.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx14.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.27]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id s75L5Rd0025476 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Tue, 5 Aug 2014 17:05:27 -0400 Received: from stumpy.slc.redhat.com (ovpn-113-85.phx2.redhat.com [10.3.113.85]) by int-mx14.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id s75L5Qq6015505; Tue, 5 Aug 2014 17:05:26 -0400 Message-ID: <53E14716.9030308@redhat.com> Date: Tue, 05 Aug 2014 21:05:00 -0000 From: Jeff Law User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.7.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org, rdsandiford@googlemail.com Subject: Re: [PATCH 16/50] ddg.c:insns_may_alias_p References: <87y4v5d77q.fsf@googlemail.com> <871tsxbrng.fsf@googlemail.com> In-Reply-To: <871tsxbrng.fsf@googlemail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2014-08/txt/msg00387.txt.bz2 On 08/03/14 07:59, Richard Sandiford wrote: > gcc/ > * ddg.c (walk_mems_2, walk_mems_1): Delete. > (insns_may_alias_p): Use FOR_EACH_SUBRTX rather than for_each_rtx > to iterate over subrtxes. Return a bool rather than an int. OK. Jeff