From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 15073 invoked by alias); 5 Aug 2014 21:09:07 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 15059 invoked by uid 89); 5 Aug 2014 21:09:06 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 X-HELO: mx1.redhat.com Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with (AES256-GCM-SHA384 encrypted) ESMTPS; Tue, 05 Aug 2014 21:09:05 +0000 Received: from int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.22]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id s75L93he006612 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Tue, 5 Aug 2014 17:09:03 -0400 Received: from stumpy.slc.redhat.com (ovpn-113-85.phx2.redhat.com [10.3.113.85]) by int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id s75L93jf018687; Tue, 5 Aug 2014 17:09:03 -0400 Message-ID: <53E147EE.1060601@redhat.com> Date: Tue, 05 Aug 2014 21:09:00 -0000 From: Jeff Law User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.7.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org, rdsandiford@googlemail.com Subject: Re: [PATCH 21/50] Faster for_each_rtx-like iterators References: <87y4v5d77q.fsf@googlemail.com> <87fvhdacp8.fsf@googlemail.com> In-Reply-To: <87fvhdacp8.fsf@googlemail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2014-08/txt/msg00390.txt.bz2 On 08/03/14 08:07, Richard Sandiford wrote: > The switch statement in the old code seemed overly cautious. It's well > established elsewhere that the first operand of an RTX_AUTOINC is the > automodified register. If anyone wanted to add a new code for which that > wasn't true they should (a) reconsider or (b) go through all RTX_AUTOINCs > as a precaution. > > > gcc/ > * emit-rtl.c: Include rtl-iter.h. > (find_auto_inc): Turn from being a for_each_rtx callback to being > a function that examines each subrtx itself. Assume the first operand > to an RTX_AUTOINC is the automodified register. > (try_split): Update call accordingly. OK. It seems like we ought to document somewhere that all autoincrement RTXs increment their first operand. If you can find a goodplace, please add that little doc update as a pre-approved patch. jeff