From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 638 invoked by alias); 12 Sep 2014 11:53:09 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 624 invoked by uid 89); 12 Sep 2014 11:53:08 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-1.8 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=no version=3.3.2 X-HELO: relay1.mentorg.com Received: from relay1.mentorg.com (HELO relay1.mentorg.com) (192.94.38.131) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Fri, 12 Sep 2014 11:53:07 +0000 Received: from nat-ies.mentorg.com ([192.94.31.2] helo=SVR-IES-FEM-01.mgc.mentorg.com) by relay1.mentorg.com with esmtp id 1XSPPS-0003gw-C2 from Bernd_Schmidt@mentor.com ; Fri, 12 Sep 2014 04:53:02 -0700 Received: from [127.0.0.1] (137.202.0.76) by SVR-IES-FEM-01.mgc.mentorg.com (137.202.0.104) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.3.181.6; Fri, 12 Sep 2014 12:53:00 +0100 Message-ID: <5412DE59.5070301@codesourcery.com> Date: Fri, 12 Sep 2014 11:53:00 -0000 From: Bernd Schmidt User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.8.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Richard Biener CC: GCC Patches Subject: Re: ptx preliminary address space fixes [3/4] References: <54117586.8050503@codesourcery.com> <5412D45A.5080705@codesourcery.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2014-09/txt/msg01047.txt.bz2 On 09/12/2014 01:45 PM, Richard Biener wrote: >> Let me know what you prefer. > > Hmm, neither I suppose. COMPLEX_TYPEs are also built > with main-variant component type and I suspect the same for > ARRAY_TYPEs. I see the address-space on types as > artifact that comes from Frontend support (aka parsing). > Fixing up the vector type in advance is ok with me but I'd like us to > move away from address-space-on-types. Is that an approval for the first variant in the sense that it's the best we can do at the moment? Or are you requiring a rewrite of all the address space support in the compiler? Bernd