From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 23212 invoked by alias); 18 Sep 2014 13:05:15 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 23201 invoked by uid 89); 18 Sep 2014 13:05:14 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-3.3 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 X-HELO: mx1.redhat.com Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with (AES256-GCM-SHA384 encrypted) ESMTPS; Thu, 18 Sep 2014 13:05:08 +0000 Received: from int-mx10.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx10.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.23]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id s8ID56UY026793 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=FAIL) for ; Thu, 18 Sep 2014 09:05:07 -0400 Received: from [10.10.51.157] (vpn-51-157.rdu2.redhat.com [10.10.51.157]) by int-mx10.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id s8ID55cL022011; Thu, 18 Sep 2014 09:05:05 -0400 Message-ID: <541AD880.7080703@redhat.com> Date: Thu, 18 Sep 2014 13:05:00 -0000 From: Andrew MacLeod User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.2.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Jakub Jelinek CC: gcc-patches Subject: Re: parallel check output changes? References: <541AD692.4030907@redhat.com> <20140918130109.GH17454@tucnak.redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <20140918130109.GH17454@tucnak.redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2014-09/txt/msg01482.txt.bz2 On 09/18/2014 09:01 AM, Jakub Jelinek wrote: > On Thu, Sep 18, 2014 at 08:56:50AM -0400, Andrew MacLeod wrote: >> Has the changes that have gone into the check parallelization made the .sum >> file non-deterministic? >> I'm seeing a lot of small hunks in different orders which cause my >> comparison scripts to show big differences. >> I haven't been paying attention to the nature of the make check changes so >> Im not sure if this is expected... >> >> Or is this something else? Its the same code base between runs, just with a >> few changes made to some include files. > I'm using contrib/test_summary and haven't seen any non-determinisms in the > output of that command. As for dg-extract-results.sh, we have two versions > of that, one if you have python 2.6 or newer, another one if you don't. > Perhaps the behavior of those two (I'm using the python version probably) > differs? > > Jakub Not sure, although I do have python 2.7.5 installed for what its worth... I'll try another run in a bit. Andrew