From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 2197 invoked by alias); 18 Sep 2014 18:25:25 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 2188 invoked by uid 89); 18 Sep 2014 18:25:25 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-2.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 X-HELO: mx1.redhat.com Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with (AES256-GCM-SHA384 encrypted) ESMTPS; Thu, 18 Sep 2014 18:25:24 +0000 Received: from int-mx13.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx13.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.26]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id s8IIPMDR028747 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=FAIL) for ; Thu, 18 Sep 2014 14:25:22 -0400 Received: from stumpy.slc.redhat.com (ovpn-113-179.phx2.redhat.com [10.3.113.179]) by int-mx13.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id s8IIPLlr020091; Thu, 18 Sep 2014 14:25:21 -0400 Message-ID: <541B2390.1000604@redhat.com> Date: Thu, 18 Sep 2014 18:25:00 -0000 From: Jeff Law User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.1.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Aldy Hernandez , gcc-patches Subject: Re: [patch] update comments on *_ultimate_origin References: <541B0B67.5090605@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <541B0B67.5090605@redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2014-09/txt/msg01530.txt.bz2 On 09/18/14 10:42, Aldy Hernandez wrote: > output_inline_function was removed in tree-ssa times, no sense > referencing it a decade later. > > I still see DECL_ABSTRACT_ORIGIN pointing to itself in some instances, > though I haven't tracked down where, so I assume we still need the > functionality, just not the comment :). > > OK for mainline? OK. jeff