From: Aldy Hernandez <aldyh@redhat.com>
To: gcc-patches <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>
Subject: [debug-early] rearrange some checks in gen_subprogram_die
Date: Mon, 29 Sep 2014 18:54:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5429AAD6.7070708@redhat.com> (raw)
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 723 bytes --]
I'm rearranging some code in Michael's original patch to minimize the
difference with mainline.
It seems that the check for DECL_STRUCT_FUNCTION (decl)->gimple_df, was
merely a check to see if we had already set the FDE bits for the decl in
question. I've moved the check inside the original DECL_EXTERNAL check,
thus making it obvious what is being accomplished.
I also got rid of mainline's gcc_checking_assert of fun. We're
dereferencing it immediately after. That should be enough to trigger an
ICE.
Also I removed Michael's check for DECL_STRUCT_FUNCTION(decl), since
mainline drops into this codepath regardless, and has/had that
gcc_checking_assert anyhow.
No regressions.
Committed to branch.
Aldy
[-- Attachment #2: curr --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 1585 bytes --]
commit a23ae1821d5c45b2c56ea5db6940ea8982f8fd69
Author: Aldy Hernandez <aldyh@redhat.com>
Date: Mon Sep 29 11:48:41 2014 -0700
* dwarf2out.c (gen_subprogram_die): Do not check
DECL_STRUCT_FUNCTION, thus leaving the check as mainline. Test
for fun>-fde instead of fun->gimple_df.
diff --git a/gcc/dwarf2out.c b/gcc/dwarf2out.c
index 41c4feb..c92101f 100644
--- a/gcc/dwarf2out.c
+++ b/gcc/dwarf2out.c
@@ -18441,9 +18441,7 @@ gen_subprogram_die (tree decl, dw_die_ref context_die)
equate_decl_number_to_die (decl, subr_die);
}
- else if (!DECL_EXTERNAL (decl)
- && (!DECL_STRUCT_FUNCTION (decl)
- || DECL_STRUCT_FUNCTION (decl)->gimple_df))
+ else if (!DECL_EXTERNAL (decl))
{
HOST_WIDE_INT cfa_fb_offset;
@@ -18452,7 +18450,9 @@ gen_subprogram_die (tree decl, dw_die_ref context_die)
if (!old_die || !get_AT (old_die, DW_AT_inline))
equate_decl_number_to_die (decl, subr_die);
- gcc_checking_assert (fun);
+ if (!fun->fde)
+ goto no_fde_continue;
+
if (!flag_reorder_blocks_and_partition)
{
dw_fde_ref fde = fun->fde;
@@ -18608,11 +18608,8 @@ gen_subprogram_die (tree decl, dw_die_ref context_die)
if (fun->static_chain_decl)
add_AT_location_description (subr_die, DW_AT_static_link,
loc_list_from_tree (fun->static_chain_decl, 2));
- }
- else if (!DECL_EXTERNAL (decl))
- {
- if (!old_die || !get_AT (old_die, DW_AT_inline))
- equate_decl_number_to_die (decl, subr_die);
+ no_fde_continue:
+ ;
}
/* Generate child dies for template paramaters. */
next reply other threads:[~2014-09-29 18:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-09-29 18:54 Aldy Hernandez [this message]
2014-09-30 10:23 ` Richard Biener
2014-09-30 15:06 ` Aldy Hernandez
2014-10-01 14:04 ` Richard Biener
2014-10-01 15:24 ` Aldy Hernandez
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5429AAD6.7070708@redhat.com \
--to=aldyh@redhat.com \
--cc=gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).