From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-patches-return-379292-listarch-gcc-patches=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 30297 invoked by alias); 1 Oct 2014 15:24:30 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-patches.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 30277 invoked by uid 89); 1 Oct 2014 15:24:26 -0000
Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none
X-Virus-Found: No
X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-1.8 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2
X-HELO: mx1.redhat.com
Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with (AES256-GCM-SHA384 encrypted) ESMTPS; Wed, 01 Oct 2014 15:24:26 +0000
Received: from int-mx10.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx10.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.23])	by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id s91FOO5a001985	(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=FAIL);	Wed, 1 Oct 2014 11:24:24 -0400
Received: from reynosa.quesejoda.com (vpn-62-110.rdu2.redhat.com [10.10.62.110])	by int-mx10.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id s91FONVG010527;	Wed, 1 Oct 2014 11:24:24 -0400
Message-ID: <542C1CA7.5050703@redhat.com>
Date: Wed, 01 Oct 2014 15:24:00 -0000
From: Aldy Hernandez <aldyh@redhat.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.7.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Richard Biener <richard.guenther@gmail.com>
CC: gcc-patches <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>
Subject: Re: [debug-early] rearrange some checks in gen_subprogram_die
References: <5429AAD6.7070708@redhat.com>	<CAFiYyc19zpYEKGo6Bzc44vbot-y+8diQzaNUB7pj9t-+PDWPRA@mail.gmail.com>	<542AC6EC.8010408@redhat.com> <CAFiYyc1qFiU1CVjQoJMG3S2GKgwnDmkgy+4w-YxxetkxFNzn8w@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAFiYyc1qFiU1CVjQoJMG3S2GKgwnDmkgy+4w-YxxetkxFNzn8w@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-SW-Source: 2014-10/txt/msg00067.txt.bz2

On 10/01/14 07:04, Richard Biener wrote:

> No, checking ->gimple_df would be odd indeed.  The check seems to be coming from
> Michas patch-set?

Correct.