From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 7425 invoked by alias); 13 Oct 2014 14:53:42 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 7416 invoked by uid 89); 13 Oct 2014 14:53:42 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-1.6 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 X-HELO: mx1.redhat.com Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with (AES256-GCM-SHA384 encrypted) ESMTPS; Mon, 13 Oct 2014 14:53:41 +0000 Received: from int-mx10.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx10.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.23]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id s9DEreKm026608 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=FAIL) for ; Mon, 13 Oct 2014 10:53:40 -0400 Received: from reynosa.quesejoda.com (vpn-49-121.rdu2.redhat.com [10.10.49.121]) by int-mx10.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id s9DErduV029129 for ; Mon, 13 Oct 2014 10:53:39 -0400 Message-ID: <543BE773.1010707@redhat.com> Date: Mon, 13 Oct 2014 14:58:00 -0000 From: Aldy Hernandez User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.1.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gcc-patches Subject: PING: Re: [patch] tag ../include/* References: <543416D2.4050100@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <543416D2.4050100@redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2014-10/txt/msg01136.txt.bz2 PING On 10/07/14 09:37, Aldy Hernandez wrote: > Is there a reason we don't create etags for toplevel include files? If > not, could I please apply this patch? > > Thanks. > Aldy