public inbox for gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Bernd Schmidt <bernds@codesourcery.com>
To: Jeff Law <law@redhat.com>, GCC Patches <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>
Subject: Re: The nvptx port [7/11+] Inform the port about call arguments
Date: Tue, 21 Oct 2014 22:16:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <5446D8FE.3030404@codesourcery.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5446D5CD.6080204@redhat.com>

On 10/21/2014 11:53 PM, Jeff Law wrote:

> So, in the end I'm torn.  I don't like adding new hooks when they're not
> needed, but I have some reservations about relying on the order of stuff
> in CALL_INSN_FUNCTION_USAGE and I worry a bit that you might end up with
> stuff other than arguments on that list -- the PA port could filter on
> the hard registers used for passing arguments, so other stuff appearing
> isn't a big deal.

This is another worry. Also, at the moment we don't actually add the 
pseudos to CALL_INSN_FUNCTION_USAGE (that's patch 6/11), we use the regs 
saved by the call_args hook to make proper USEs in a PARALLEL. I'm not 
convinced the rest of the compiler would be too happy to see pseudos there.

So, in all I'd say it's probably possible to do it that way, but it 
feels a lot iffier than I'd be happy with. I for one didn't know about 
the PA requirement, so I could easily have broken it unknowingly if I'd 
made some random change modifying call expansion.


Bernd

  reply	other threads:[~2014-10-21 22:08 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 83+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-10-20 14:19 The nvptx port [0/11+] Bernd Schmidt
2014-10-20 14:21 ` The nvptx port [1/11+] indirect jumps Bernd Schmidt
2014-10-21 18:29   ` Jeff Law
2014-10-21 21:03     ` Bernd Schmidt
2014-10-21 21:30       ` Jakub Jelinek
2014-10-21 21:37         ` Bernd Schmidt
2014-10-22  8:21           ` Richard Biener
2014-10-22  8:34             ` Jakub Jelinek
2014-10-22  8:37             ` Thomas Schwinge
2014-10-22 10:03               ` Richard Biener
2014-10-22 10:32                 ` Jakub Jelinek
2014-11-04 15:35   ` Bernd Schmidt
2014-11-04 15:43     ` Richard Henderson
2014-10-20 14:22 ` The nvptx port [2/11+] No register allocation Bernd Schmidt
2014-10-20 14:24 ` The nvptx port [3/11+] Struct returns Bernd Schmidt
2014-10-21 18:41   ` Jeff Law
2014-10-20 14:24 ` The nvptx port [2/11+] No register allocation Bernd Schmidt
2014-10-21 18:36   ` Jeff Law
2014-10-20 14:27 ` The nvptx port [4/11+] Post-RA pipeline Bernd Schmidt
2014-10-21 18:42   ` Jeff Law
2024-06-28 15:07   ` Document 'pass_postreload' vs. 'pass_late_compilation' (was: The nvptx port [4/11+] Post-RA pipeline) Thomas Schwinge
2014-10-20 14:27 ` The nvptx port [5/11+] Variable declarations Bernd Schmidt
2014-10-21 18:44   ` Jeff Law
2014-10-20 14:31 ` The nvptx port [6/11+] Pseudo call args Bernd Schmidt
2014-10-21 18:56   ` Jeff Law
2014-10-20 14:32 ` The nvptx port [8/11+] Write undefined decls Bernd Schmidt
2014-10-21 22:07   ` Jeff Law
2014-10-21 22:30     ` Bernd Schmidt
2014-10-22 18:23       ` Jeff Law
2014-11-05 12:05         ` Bernd Schmidt
2014-11-05 20:05           ` Jeff Law
2014-10-20 14:32 ` The nvptx port [7/11+] Inform the port about call arguments Bernd Schmidt
2014-10-21 21:25   ` Jeff Law
2014-10-21 21:33     ` Bernd Schmidt
2014-10-21 21:55       ` Jeff Law
2014-10-21 22:16         ` Bernd Schmidt [this message]
2014-10-22 18:23           ` Jeff Law
2014-10-28 14:57             ` Bernd Schmidt
2014-10-29 23:42               ` Jeff Law
2014-10-20 14:35 ` The nvptx port [9/11+] Epilogues Bernd Schmidt
2014-10-21 22:08   ` Jeff Law
2014-10-20 14:50 ` The nvptx port [10/11+] Target files Bernd Schmidt
2014-10-22 18:12   ` Jeff Law
2014-10-28 15:10     ` Bernd Schmidt
2014-10-29 23:51       ` Jeff Law
2014-10-30  2:53         ` Bernd Schmidt
2014-10-30  3:09           ` Jeff Law
2014-11-10 16:33         ` Bernd Schmidt
2014-11-10 20:06           ` Jakub Jelinek
2014-11-10 20:37             ` H.J. Lu
2014-11-10 20:40             ` H.J. Lu
2014-11-10 20:42               ` Mike Stump
2014-12-12 20:18           ` Thomas Schwinge
2014-12-23 18:51           ` nvptx-tools and nvptx-newlib (was: The nvptx port [10/11+] Target files) Thomas Schwinge
2015-02-02 15:33             ` Thomas Schwinge
2015-02-04  9:43               ` Jakub Jelinek
2015-02-18  8:50                 ` Thomas Schwinge
2015-02-18  9:03                   ` Jakub Jelinek
2015-07-08 15:03                   ` [nvptx offloading] Only 64-bit configurations are currently supported (was: nvptx-tools and nvptx-newlib) Thomas Schwinge
2015-07-14 20:10                     ` [nvptx offloading] Only 64-bit configurations are currently supported Thomas Schwinge
2015-07-14 20:25                       ` Richard Biener
2021-01-14 18:18                     ` [nvptx libgomp plugin] Build only in supported configurations (was: [nvptx offloading] Only 64-bit configurations are currently supported) Thomas Schwinge
2021-03-04  8:52                       ` [committed] libgomp: Use sizeof(void*) based checks instead of looking through $CC $CFLAGS for -m32/-mx32 Jakub Jelinek
2021-03-22 11:24                         ` Thomas Schwinge
2014-11-04 16:48       ` The nvptx port [10/11+] Target files Richard Henderson
2014-11-04 16:55         ` Bernd Schmidt
2014-11-05 13:07           ` Bernd Schmidt
2014-10-20 14:58 ` The nvptx port [11/11] More tools Bernd Schmidt
2014-10-21  0:16   ` Joseph S. Myers
2014-10-22 20:40   ` Jeff Law
2014-10-22 21:16     ` Bernd Schmidt
2014-10-24 19:52       ` Jeff Law
2014-10-31 21:04   ` Jeff Law
     [not found]     ` <54542050.6010908@codesourcery.com>
2014-11-03 21:49       ` Jeff Law
2014-10-21  8:23 ` The nvptx port [0/11+] Richard Biener
2014-10-21 10:57   ` Bernd Schmidt
2014-10-21 11:27     ` Richard Biener
2014-10-21  9:17 ` Jakub Jelinek
2014-10-21 11:19   ` Bernd Schmidt
2014-11-12 12:36 ` Richard Biener
2014-11-12 21:39   ` Jeff Law
2015-02-18  7:48 ` nvptx-none: Define empty GOMP_SELF_SPECS (was: The nvptx port [0/11+]) Thomas Schwinge
2015-02-18  8:01 ` The nvptx port [0/11+] Thomas Schwinge

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=5446D8FE.3030404@codesourcery.com \
    --to=bernds@codesourcery.com \
    --cc=gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=law@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).