From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 21318 invoked by alias); 29 Oct 2014 11:03:41 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 21260 invoked by uid 89); 29 Oct 2014 11:03:40 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-2.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 X-HELO: mail-wg0-f54.google.com Received: from mail-wg0-f54.google.com (HELO mail-wg0-f54.google.com) (74.125.82.54) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with (AES128-SHA encrypted) ESMTPS; Wed, 29 Oct 2014 11:03:37 +0000 Received: by mail-wg0-f54.google.com with SMTP id m15so1578503wgh.13 for ; Wed, 29 Oct 2014 04:03:34 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 10.194.222.162 with SMTP id qn2mr11757571wjc.74.1414580614431; Wed, 29 Oct 2014 04:03:34 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.10.150] (net-37-117-142-149.cust.vodafonedsl.it. [37.117.142.149]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id q9sm18348325wix.6.2014.10.29.04.03.32 for (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 29 Oct 2014 04:03:33 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <5450C983.4020501@gnu.org> Date: Wed, 29 Oct 2014 11:24:00 -0000 From: Paolo Bonzini User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.2.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Phil Muldoon , Jakub Jelinek , DJ Delorie , aoliva@redhat.com, Ralf Wildenhues , tom@tromey.com CC: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Re: libcc1 References: <20141029103151.GQ10376@tucnak.redhat.com> <5450C862.908@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <5450C862.908@redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2014-10/txt/msg03055.txt.bz2 On 10/29/2014 11:58 AM, Phil Muldoon wrote: > My archaeology into the source repository has not revealed why > we needed bootstrap. Perhaps we included it out of a sense of > paranoia for testing. I've CC'd Tom on this, so he may have an > opinion or insight. From my point of view, I see no value in > bootstrapping libcc1 now. It's not a required build to bootstrap GCC. Then I agree, I don't think it needs to be bootstrapped. Paolo