From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 15308 invoked by alias); 17 Nov 2014 19:55:54 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 15298 invoked by uid 89); 17 Nov 2014 19:55:53 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-1.8 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 X-HELO: mx1.redhat.com Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with (AES256-GCM-SHA384 encrypted) ESMTPS; Mon, 17 Nov 2014 19:55:48 +0000 Received: from int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.22]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id sAHJtYQo021750 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=FAIL); Mon, 17 Nov 2014 14:55:34 -0500 Received: from [10.3.113.65] (ovpn-113-65.phx2.redhat.com [10.3.113.65]) by int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id sAHJtXfV019125; Mon, 17 Nov 2014 14:55:34 -0500 Message-ID: <546A52B5.605@redhat.com> Date: Mon, 17 Nov 2014 20:05:00 -0000 From: Jeff Law User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.2.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Jan Hubicka CC: Andi Kleen , gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Re: [WEB][PATCH] Describe -pg and LTO changes References: <20141116200245.GA10567@basil.fritz.box> <546A5002.3010004@redhat.com> <20141117195200.GB13704@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz> In-Reply-To: <20141117195200.GB13704@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2014-11/txt/msg02150.txt.bz2 On 11/17/14 12:52, Jan Hubicka wrote: >> On 11/16/14 13:02, Andi Kleen wrote: >>> >>> This patch describes some user visible changes that were >>> added to gcc 5. >>> >>> Ok to commit? >> Yes, this is fine. Thanks, > ... which remind me that I also wrote some update that apparently was never approved Looks good to me. jeff