From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 5640 invoked by alias); 26 Nov 2014 12:24:31 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 5610 invoked by uid 89); 26 Nov 2014 12:24:29 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-1.1 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 X-HELO: relay1.mentorg.com Received: from relay1.mentorg.com (HELO relay1.mentorg.com) (192.94.38.131) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Wed, 26 Nov 2014 12:24:27 +0000 Received: from nat-ies.mentorg.com ([192.94.31.2] helo=SVR-IES-FEM-01.mgc.mentorg.com) by relay1.mentorg.com with esmtp id 1Xtbdu-00014j-7L from Andrew_Stubbs@mentor.com ; Wed, 26 Nov 2014 04:24:22 -0800 Received: from [172.30.0.130] (137.202.0.76) by SVR-IES-FEM-01.mgc.mentorg.com (137.202.0.104) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.3.181.6; Wed, 26 Nov 2014 12:24:19 +0000 Message-ID: <5475C670.5020009@mentor.com> Date: Wed, 26 Nov 2014 13:11:00 -0000 From: Andrew Stubbs User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.2.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Andrew Stubbs , Jiong Wang , James Greenhalgh , Richard Earnshaw CC: "gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org" Subject: Re: [arm][patch] fix arm_neon_ok check on !arm_arch7 References: <5414B99D.3020202@codesourcery.com> <5416B580.9070208@arm.com> <5416C5C3.8070603@codesourcery.com>,<20140923082716.GA28745@arm.com> <543EA224.1020501@arm.com> <543EA79E.5050601@mentor.com> <543FCD04.90407@arm.com> <545CA061.7040006@codesourcery.com> <5465E394.8010001@codesourcery.com> In-Reply-To: <5465E394.8010001@codesourcery.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2014-11/txt/msg03267.txt.bz2 On 14/11/14 11:12, Andrew Stubbs wrote: > On 07/11/14 10:35, Andrew Stubbs wrote: >>> if armv6 never co-exist with NEON, personally I think your original >>> patch is better >>> because TARGET_NEON generally will be used when all options are >>> processed. >>> >>> any way, this needs gate keeper's approval. >> >> Ping, Richard. > > Ping. Ping. Andrew