From: Renlin Li <renlin.li@arm.com>
To: "gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org" <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>
Cc: marcus Shawcroft <Marcus.Shawcroft@arm.com>,
ramana Radhakrishnan <ramana.radhakrishnan@arm.com>
Subject: [PATCH][AARCH64]Add ACLE 2.0 predefined macros: __ARM_ALIGN_MAX_PWR and __ARM_ALIGN_MAX_STACK_PWR
Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2014 10:24:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <54900732.4010604@arm.com> (raw)
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 881 bytes --]
Hi all,
This is a simple patch to add another two ACLE 2.0 predefined macros
into aarch64 backend.
They are __ARM_ALIGN_MAX_PWR and __ARM_ALIGN_MAX_STACK_PWR. Currently,
those two values are hard-wired to 16.
The following clauses from ACLE 2.0 documentation indicate the meaning
of those two macros:
The macro __ARM_ALIGN_MAX_STACK_PWR indicates (as the exponent of a
power of 2) the maximum available stack alignment.
The macro __ARM_ALIGN_MAX_PWR indicates (as the exponent of a power of
2) the maximum available alignment of static data.
aarch64-none-elf target is tested on on the model. No new regression.
Is it Okay for trunk?
Regards,
Renlin Li
gcc/ChangeLog
2014-12-16 Renlin Li <renlin.li@arm.com>
* config/aarch64/aarch64.h(TARGET_CPU_CPP_BUILTINS): Define
__ARM_ALIGN_MAX_PWR
and __ARM_ALIGN_MAX_STACK_PWR.
[-- Warning: decoded text below may be mangled, UTF-8 assumed --]
[-- Attachment #2: align.patch --]
[-- Type: text/x-patch; name=align.patch, Size: 798 bytes --]
diff --git a/gcc/config/aarch64/aarch64.h b/gcc/config/aarch64/aarch64.h
index 8ed1f84..78417d7 100644
--- a/gcc/config/aarch64/aarch64.h
+++ b/gcc/config/aarch64/aarch64.h
@@ -29,6 +29,10 @@
builtin_define ("__aarch64__"); \
builtin_define ("__ARM_64BIT_STATE"); \
builtin_define_with_int_value \
+ ("__ARM_ALIGN_MAX_PWR", 16); \
+ builtin_define_with_int_value \
+ ("__ARM_ALIGN_MAX_STACK_PWR", 16); \
+ builtin_define_with_int_value \
("__ARM_ARCH", aarch64_architecture_version); \
cpp_define_formatted \
(parse_in, "__ARM_ARCH_%dA", aarch64_architecture_version); \
next reply other threads:[~2014-12-16 10:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-12-16 10:24 Renlin Li [this message]
2015-04-28 16:01 ` [PING][PATCH][AARCH64]Add " Renlin Li
2015-04-28 17:04 ` [PATCH][AARCH64]Add " Marcus Shawcroft
2015-04-29 1:25 ` Andrew Pinski
2015-04-29 11:14 ` Marcus Shawcroft
2015-06-04 13:59 ` Renlin Li
2015-06-11 10:56 ` Marcus Shawcroft
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=54900732.4010604@arm.com \
--to=renlin.li@arm.com \
--cc=Marcus.Shawcroft@arm.com \
--cc=gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org \
--cc=ramana.radhakrishnan@arm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).