From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 28850 invoked by alias); 19 Dec 2014 10:24:31 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 28838 invoked by uid 89); 19 Dec 2014 10:24:29 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-1.8 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 X-HELO: service87.mimecast.com Received: from service87.mimecast.com (HELO service87.mimecast.com) (91.220.42.44) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Fri, 19 Dec 2014 10:24:27 +0000 Received: from cam-owa1.Emea.Arm.com (fw-tnat.cambridge.arm.com [217.140.96.140]) by service87.mimecast.com; Fri, 19 Dec 2014 10:24:24 +0000 Received: from [10.1.207.43] ([10.1.255.212]) by cam-owa1.Emea.Arm.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); Fri, 19 Dec 2014 10:24:24 +0000 Message-ID: <5493FCD7.8000708@arm.com> Date: Fri, 19 Dec 2014 10:28:00 -0000 From: Kyrill Tkachov User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.2.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: James Greenhalgh CC: GCC Patches , Ramana Radhakrishnan , Richard Earnshaw Subject: Re: [PATCH][ARM][doc] Remove mention of Advanced RISC Machines References: <548879B8.6010705@arm.com> <54930C5A.90008@arm.com> <20141218173737.GA29904@arm.com> In-Reply-To: <20141218173737.GA29904@arm.com> X-MC-Unique: 114121910242405301 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=WINDOWS-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2014-12/txt/msg01626.txt.bz2 On 18/12/14 17:37, James Greenhalgh wrote: > On Thu, Dec 18, 2014 at 05:18:18PM +0000, Kyrill Tkachov wrote: >> Ping. >> https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2014-12/msg00947.html > This patch almost certainly falls under the obvious rule: > > "will the person who objects to my work the most be able to > find a fault with my fix?" > > ARM hasn't stood for "Advanced RISC Machines" since 1998, so I can't see > even your most fervent nemesis objecting to this one! Yeah, one could almost make an argument that it's a typo fix. Committed as r218897. Thanks, Kyrill > > Cheers, > James > >> Thanks, >> Kyrill >> On 10/12/14 16:50, Kyrill Tkachov wrote: >>> Hi all, >>> >>> The company ARM is not Advanced RISC Machines anymore and anyway the ARM >>> architecture is distinct from the company. >>> This patch adjusts the documentation accordingly. >>> >>> Ok? >>> >>> Thanks, >>> Kyrill >>> >>> 2014-12-10 Kyrylo Tkachov >>> >>> * doc/invoke.texi (ARM options): Remove mention of Advanced RISC >>> Machines. >> >>