From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 32492 invoked by alias); 14 Jan 2015 21:24:15 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 32469 invoked by uid 89); 14 Jan 2015 21:24:10 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-3.7 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 X-HELO: mx1.redhat.com Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with (AES256-GCM-SHA384 encrypted) ESMTPS; Wed, 14 Jan 2015 21:24:05 +0000 Received: from int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.22]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id t0ELO4Lj006617 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=FAIL); Wed, 14 Jan 2015 16:24:04 -0500 Received: from [10.10.116.16] ([10.10.116.16]) by int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id t0ELO3Rm007900; Wed, 14 Jan 2015 16:24:03 -0500 Message-ID: <54B6DE6E.1050909@redhat.com> Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2015 21:34:00 -0000 From: Jason Merrill User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.3.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Paolo Carlini , "gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org" Subject: Re: [C++ Patch/RFC] PR 58671 References: <54B66B5D.4040100@oracle.com> <54B68476.40808@redhat.com> <54B68663.3010308@oracle.com> In-Reply-To: <54B68663.3010308@oracle.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2015-01/txt/msg01110.txt.bz2 On 01/14/2015 10:08 AM, Paolo Carlini wrote: > I can look again, but as far as I remember nothing is clearing it, it > just stay false because the ICE happens while we process the 'i' on the > right hand side and the DECL_INITIALIZED_P becomes true only in > cp_finish_decl. Ah, please say that in the comment. OK with that change. Jason