public inbox for gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* proper name of i386/x86-64/etc targets
@ 2015-01-02  0:30 Sandra Loosemore
       [not found] ` <54BDBCF0.9050801@codesourcery.com>
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Sandra Loosemore @ 2015-01-02  0:30 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: rth, hubicka, ubizjak; +Cc: GCC Patches

I've noticed that the GCC user documentation is quite inconsistent about 
the name(s) it uses for i386/x86-64/etc targets.  invoke.texi has a 
section for "i386 and x86-64 Options", but in other places the manual 
uses x86, X86, i?86, i[34567]86, x86_64 (underscore instead of a dash), etc.

I'd be happy to work on a patch to bring the manual to using a common 
naming convention, but what should it be?  Wikipedia seems to use "x86" 
(lowercase) to refer to the entire family of architectures (including 
the original 16-bit variants), "IA-32" for the 32-bit architecture (I 
believe that is Intel's official name), and "x86-64" (with a dash 
instead of underscore) for the 64-bit architecture.  But of course the 
target maintainers should have the final say on what names to use.

-Sandra

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2015-04-08 11:39 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2015-01-02  0:30 proper name of i386/x86-64/etc targets Sandra Loosemore
     [not found] ` <54BDBCF0.9050801@codesourcery.com>
     [not found]   ` <1470230.JDgFJo2Qyv@polaris>
     [not found]     ` <CAMe9rOonSQrGjr3qFohdp6_x--7wPAu=_zr345oKt9MOxYmi1Q@mail.gmail.com>
2015-01-27  5:11       ` [ping] " Sandra Loosemore
2015-01-27 18:57         ` Uros Bizjak
2015-04-08 11:39         ` Gerald Pfeifer

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).