* [PATCH] PR64159
@ 2015-01-29 20:27 David Edelsohn
2015-01-29 21:11 ` Rainer Orth
2015-01-30 9:12 ` Jeff Law
0 siblings, 2 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: David Edelsohn @ 2015-01-29 20:27 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: GCC Patches
As discussed in the PR and referenced by the comment in the testcase
itself, the failure is expected on PowerPC and also occurs on SPARC.
Thanks, David
* gcc.dg/tree-ssa/ssa-dom-cse-2.c: XFAIL for powerpc*-*-* and sparc*-*-*.
Index: ssa-dom-cse-2.c
===================================================================
--- ssa-dom-cse-2.c (revision 220256)
+++ ssa-dom-cse-2.c (working copy)
@@ -20,5 +20,5 @@
/* See PR63679, if the target forces the initializer to memory then
DOM is not able to perform this optimization. */
-/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump "return 28;" "optimized" { xfail
hppa*-*-* } } } */
+/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump "return 28;" "optimized" { xfail
hppa*-*-* powerpc*-*-* sparc*-*-*} } } */
/* { dg-final { cleanup-tree-dump "optimized" } } */
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] PR64159
2015-01-29 20:27 [PATCH] PR64159 David Edelsohn
@ 2015-01-29 21:11 ` Rainer Orth
2015-01-30 9:12 ` Jeff Law
1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Rainer Orth @ 2015-01-29 21:11 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: David Edelsohn; +Cc: GCC Patches
David Edelsohn <dje.gcc@gmail.com> writes:
> As discussed in the PR and referenced by the comment in the testcase
> itself, the failure is expected on PowerPC and also occurs on SPARC.
>
> Thanks, David
>
> * gcc.dg/tree-ssa/ssa-dom-cse-2.c: XFAIL for powerpc*-*-* and sparc*-*-*.
>
> Index: ssa-dom-cse-2.c
> ===================================================================
> --- ssa-dom-cse-2.c (revision 220256)
> +++ ssa-dom-cse-2.c (working copy)
> @@ -20,5 +20,5 @@
> /* See PR63679, if the target forces the initializer to memory then
> DOM is not able to perform this optimization. */
>
> -/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump "return 28;" "optimized" { xfail
> hppa*-*-* } } } */
> +/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump "return 28;" "optimized" { xfail
> hppa*-*-* powerpc*-*-* sparc*-*-*} } } */
> /* { dg-final { cleanup-tree-dump "optimized" } } */
If this go in, please add both a PR reference in the ChangeLog and a
comment referencing that PR about the xfail.
Thanks.
Rainer
--
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Rainer Orth, Center for Biotechnology, Bielefeld University
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] PR64159
2015-01-29 20:27 [PATCH] PR64159 David Edelsohn
2015-01-29 21:11 ` Rainer Orth
@ 2015-01-30 9:12 ` Jeff Law
1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Jeff Law @ 2015-01-30 9:12 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: David Edelsohn, GCC Patches
On 01/29/15 12:27, David Edelsohn wrote:
> As discussed in the PR and referenced by the comment in the testcase
> itself, the failure is expected on PowerPC and also occurs on SPARC.
>
> Thanks, David
>
> * gcc.dg/tree-ssa/ssa-dom-cse-2.c: XFAIL for powerpc*-*-* and sparc*-*-*.
Seems good to me. As Rainer noted, PR marker and comment seems wise.
Jeff
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2015-01-30 6:00 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2015-01-29 20:27 [PATCH] PR64159 David Edelsohn
2015-01-29 21:11 ` Rainer Orth
2015-01-30 9:12 ` Jeff Law
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).