On 23-02-15 11:09, Tom de Vries wrote:
> On 23-02-15 09:26, Michael Matz wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> On Sun, 22 Feb 2015, Tom de Vries wrote:
>>
>>> Btw, I'm wondering if as run-time optimization we can tentatively set
>>> PROP_gimple_lva at the start of the gimple pass, and unset it in
>>> gimplify_va_arg_expr. That way we would avoid the loop in
>>> expand_ifn_va_arg_1 (over all bbs and gimples) in functions without
>>> va_arg.
>>
>> That makes sense.
>>
>
> I'll put this follow-up patch through testing.

Bootstrapped and reg-tested as before together with the rest of the patch series.

OK for stage1?

Thanks,
- Tom