From: Alex Velenko <Alex.Velenko@arm.com>
To: Richard Henderson <rth@redhat.com>
Cc: "H.J. Lu" <hjl.tools@gmail.com>,
Jack Howarth <howarth.at.gcc@gmail.com>,
GCC Patches <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>,
Ramana Radhakrishnan <Ramana.Radhakrishnan@arm.com>,
Jan Hubicka <hubicka@ucw.cz>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] PR rtl-optimization/32219: optimizer causees wrong code in pic/hidden/weak symbol checking
Date: Tue, 03 Mar 2015 15:58:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <54F5DA29.70004@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <54E61CAE.30804@redhat.com>
On 19/02/15 17:26, Richard Henderson wrote:
> On 02/19/2015 09:08 AM, Alex Velenko wrote:
>> Your suggestion seem to fix gcc.target/arm/long-calls-1.c, but has to be
>> thoroughly tested.
>
> Before you do complete testing, please also delete the TREE_STATIC test.
> That bit should never be relevant to functions, as it indicates not that
> it is in the compilation unit, but that it has static (as opposed to
> automatic) storage duration. Thus it is only relevant to variables.
>
>
> r~
>
>
>
> diff --git a/gcc/config/arm/arm.c b/gcc/config/arm/arm.c
> index 7bf5b4d..777230e 100644
> --- a/gcc/config/arm/arm.c
> +++ b/gcc/config/arm/arm.c
> @@ -6392,14 +6392,8 @@ arm_set_default_type_attributes (tree type)
> static bool
> arm_function_in_section_p (tree decl, section *section)
> {
> - /* We can only be certain about functions defined in the same
> - compilation unit. */
> - if (!TREE_STATIC (decl))
> - return false;
> -
> - /* Make sure that SYMBOL always binds to the definition in this
> - compilation unit. */
> - if (!targetm.binds_local_p (decl))
> + /* We can only be certain about the prevailing symbol definition. */
> + if (!decl_binds_to_current_def_p (decl))
> return false;
>
> /* If DECL_SECTION_NAME is set, assume it is trustworthy. */
>
>
Hi,
Did a bootstrap and a full regression run on arm-none-linux-gnueabihf,
No new regressions found. Some previously failing tests in libstdc++
started to fail differently, for example:
< ERROR: 22_locale/num_get/get/wchar_t/2.cc: can't read
"additional_sources": no such variable for " dg-do 22 run { xfail
lax_strtof\
p } "
< UNRESOLVED: 22_locale/num_get/get/wchar_t/2.cc: can't read
"additional_sources": no such variable for " dg-do 22 run { xfail lax_s\
trtofp } "
---
> ERROR: 22_locale/num_get/get/wchar_t/2.cc: can't read
"et_cache(uclibc,value)": no such element in array for " dg-do 22 run {
xfai\
l lax_strtofp } "
> UNRESOLVED: 22_locale/num_get/get/wchar_t/2.cc: can't read
"et_cache(uclibc,value)": no such element in array for " dg-do 22 run {\
xfail lax_strtofp } "
But I think it is okay.
Kind regards,
Alex
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-03-03 15:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 53+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-02-06 16:23 [PATCH] PR rtl-optimization/32219: optimizer causes " H.J. Lu
2015-02-06 21:31 ` Jack Howarth
2015-02-06 21:41 ` H.J. Lu
2015-02-06 21:51 ` Jack Howarth
2015-02-07 1:50 ` H.J. Lu
2015-02-07 1:51 ` Jack Howarth
2015-02-07 1:55 ` H.J. Lu
2015-02-07 2:25 ` Jack Howarth
2015-02-07 8:28 ` Jack Howarth
2015-02-07 12:27 ` H.J. Lu
2015-02-07 15:11 ` Jack Howarth
2015-02-07 15:25 ` Jack Howarth
2015-02-07 15:56 ` H.J. Lu
2015-02-07 16:45 ` H.J. Lu
2015-02-08 18:24 ` Jack Howarth
2015-02-09 17:26 ` Mike Stump
2015-02-10 18:33 ` Jack Howarth
2015-02-10 21:19 ` Richard Henderson
2015-02-10 21:25 ` H.J. Lu
2015-02-11 14:35 ` Jack Howarth
2015-02-12 6:23 ` [PATCH] PR rtl-optimization/32219: optimizer causees " Richard Henderson
2015-02-12 18:16 ` H.J. Lu
2015-02-12 18:58 ` H.J. Lu
2015-02-12 19:25 ` Richard Henderson
2015-02-12 23:04 ` H.J. Lu
2015-02-12 23:05 ` H.J. Lu
2015-02-13 0:05 ` Richard Henderson
2015-02-13 4:14 ` H.J. Lu
2015-02-13 5:11 ` Richard Henderson
2015-02-18 14:17 ` Alex Velenko
2015-02-19 13:12 ` H.J. Lu
2015-02-19 15:02 ` Richard Henderson
2015-02-19 17:25 ` Alex Velenko
2015-02-19 17:27 ` Richard Henderson
2015-03-03 15:58 ` Alex Velenko [this message]
2015-03-05 14:55 ` Alex Velenko
2015-03-05 15:31 ` Ramana Radhakrishnan
2015-03-06 11:14 ` Alex Velenko
2015-02-12 19:16 ` Jack Howarth
2015-02-12 19:18 ` H.J. Lu
2015-02-12 19:39 ` Jack Howarth
2015-02-07 19:37 ` [PATCH] PR rtl-optimization/32219: optimizer causes " Jack Howarth
2015-02-16 13:25 [PATCH] PR rtl-optimization/32219: optimizer causees " Uros Bizjak
2015-02-16 14:01 ` H.J. Lu
2015-02-16 16:30 ` Richard Henderson
2015-02-16 16:38 ` H.J. Lu
2015-02-19 21:07 ` Uros Bizjak
2015-02-19 21:08 ` H.J. Lu
2015-02-19 21:16 ` Richard Henderson
2015-02-19 21:16 ` H.J. Lu
2015-02-19 21:35 ` Richard Henderson
2015-02-19 21:43 ` H.J. Lu
2015-02-19 23:39 ` Uros Bizjak
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=54F5DA29.70004@arm.com \
--to=alex.velenko@arm.com \
--cc=Ramana.Radhakrishnan@arm.com \
--cc=gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org \
--cc=hjl.tools@gmail.com \
--cc=howarth.at.gcc@gmail.com \
--cc=hubicka@ucw.cz \
--cc=rth@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).