public inbox for gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jeff Law <law@redhat.com>
To: Martin Sebor <msebor@gmail.com>, gcc-patches <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] avoid -Warray-bounds checks for vtable assignments (PR 98266)
Date: Mon, 8 Feb 2021 12:59:37 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <55235bab-1a5a-4e3b-3a57-55d9a84ae00c@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <7fa3c1e0-8a09-3436-8669-6d1a577ca247@gmail.com>



On 1/19/21 5:56 PM, Martin Sebor via Gcc-patches wrote:
> Similar to the problem reported for -Wstringop-overflow in pr98266
> and already fixed, -Warray-bounds is also susceptible to false
> positives in assignments and copies involving virtual inheritance.
> Because the two warnings don't share code yet (hopefully in GCC 12)
> the attached patch adds its own workaround for this problem to
> gimple-array-bounds.cc, this one slightly more crude because of
> the limited insight the array bounds checking has into the checked
> expressions.
>
> Tested on x86_64-linux.
>
> Martin
>
> gcc-98266.diff
>
> PR middle-end/98266 - bogus array subscript is partly outside array bounds on virtual inheritance
>
> gcc/ChangeLog:
>
> 	PR middle-end/98266
> 	* gimple-array-bounds.cc (array_bounds_checker::check_array_bounds):
> 	Avoid checking references involving artificial members.
>
> gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
>
> 	PR middle-end/98266
> 	* g++.dg/warn/Warray-bounds-15.C: New test.
It seems to me that we've got the full statement at some point  and thus
the full expression so at some point couldn't we detect when
TYPE_SIZE_UNIT!= DECL_SIZE_UNIT?  Or should we be using TYPE_SIZE_UNIT
rather than DECL_SIZE_UNIT in gimple-array-bounds.cc

Am I missing something?


jeff


  parent reply	other threads:[~2021-02-08 19:59 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-01-20  0:56 Martin Sebor
2021-01-29 17:22 ` PING " Martin Sebor
2021-02-06 17:12   ` PING 2 " Martin Sebor
2021-02-08 19:59 ` Jeff Law [this message]
2021-02-08 21:56   ` Martin Sebor
2021-02-08 22:26     ` Jeff Law
2021-02-08 22:44       ` Martin Sebor
2021-02-08 23:11         ` Jeff Law
2021-02-09 17:49           ` Martin Sebor
2021-02-23 16:02             ` PING " Martin Sebor
2021-02-23 21:52               ` Jason Merrill
2021-02-23 23:07                 ` Martin Sebor
2021-02-25  0:35                   ` Jason Merrill
2021-03-01 23:11                     ` Martin Sebor
2021-03-02 14:11                       ` Jason Merrill
2021-03-03 23:20                         ` Martin Sebor
2021-03-04  5:33                           ` Jason Merrill
2021-03-04 17:44                             ` Martin Sebor
2021-03-04 20:00                               ` Jason Merrill
2021-02-25 23:47                 ` Jeff Law
2021-02-26  3:56                   ` Jason Merrill
2021-02-25 23:40         ` Jeff Law
2021-03-01 23:16           ` Martin Sebor
2021-02-25 23:15     ` Jeff Law

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=55235bab-1a5a-4e3b-3a57-55d9a84ae00c@redhat.com \
    --to=law@redhat.com \
    --cc=gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=msebor@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).