From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 26471 invoked by alias); 10 Apr 2015 16:39:12 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 26411 invoked by uid 89); 10 Apr 2015 16:39:11 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-3.6 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 X-HELO: mx1.redhat.com Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with (AES256-GCM-SHA384 encrypted) ESMTPS; Fri, 10 Apr 2015 16:39:11 +0000 Received: from int-mx14.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx14.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.27]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id t3AGd9TQ002769 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=FAIL) for ; Fri, 10 Apr 2015 12:39:09 -0400 Received: from [10.3.113.160] (ovpn-113-160.phx2.redhat.com [10.3.113.160]) by int-mx14.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id t3AGd87D006648 for ; Fri, 10 Apr 2015 12:39:09 -0400 Message-ID: <5527FCAC.3090205@redhat.com> Date: Fri, 10 Apr 2015 16:39:00 -0000 From: Vladimir Makarov User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.5.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org" Subject: patch for PR65729 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2015-04/txt/msg00459.txt.bz2 I've committed the following patch for https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65729 The assert is definitely wrong. We will work for the right one for GCC-5.1. Committed as rev. 221975. 2015-04-10 Vladimir Makarov PR target/65729 * lra-constraints.c (prohibited_class_reg_set_mode_p): Comment the assert. Index: lra-constraints.c =================================================================== --- lra-constraints.c (revision 221949) +++ lra-constraints.c (working copy) @@ -1656,7 +1656,8 @@ { HARD_REG_SET temp; - lra_assert (hard_reg_set_subset_p (set, reg_class_contents[rclass])); + // ??? Is this assert right + // lra_assert (hard_reg_set_subset_p (set, reg_class_contents[rclass])); COPY_HARD_REG_SET (temp, set); AND_COMPL_HARD_REG_SET (temp, lra_no_alloc_regs); return (hard_reg_set_subset_p