From: Kyrill Tkachov <kyrylo.tkachov@arm.com>
To: GCC Patches <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>
Cc: Ramana Radhakrishnan <ramana.radhakrishnan@arm.com>,
Richard Earnshaw <Richard.Earnshaw@arm.com>
Subject: [PATCH][ARM][cleanup] Use std::sort rather than manually sorting in gen_ldm_seq
Date: Tue, 14 Apr 2015 12:39:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <552D0A6E.6080302@arm.com> (raw)
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 357 bytes --]
Hi all,
This patch replaces a manual ascending-order sort by a call to std::sort.
This makes the code simpler and more readable IMHO.
Bootstrapped and tested on arm.
Ok for trunk?
Thanks,
Kyrill
2015-04-14 Kyrylo Tkachov <kyrylo.tkachov@arm.com>
* config/arm/arm.c (gen_ldm_seq): Use std::sort instead of sorting
manually.
[-- Warning: decoded text below may be mangled, UTF-8 assumed --]
[-- Attachment #2: arm-sort.patch --]
[-- Type: text/x-patch; name=arm-sort.patch, Size: 1083 bytes --]
commit 1c51dda9a66fc997ab0ab1e4de66ff861b4a9545
Author: Kyrylo Tkachov <kyrylo.tkachov@arm.com>
Date: Wed Mar 18 14:53:13 2015 +0000
[ARM][cleanup] Use std::sort rather than manually sorting in gen_ldm_seq
diff --git a/gcc/config/arm/arm.c b/gcc/config/arm/arm.c
index 2925e09..21409a0 100644
--- a/gcc/config/arm/arm.c
+++ b/gcc/config/arm/arm.c
@@ -14407,7 +14407,7 @@ gen_ldm_seq (rtx *operands, int nops, bool sort_regs)
{
int regs[MAX_LDM_STM_OPS], mem_order[MAX_LDM_STM_OPS];
rtx mems[MAX_LDM_STM_OPS];
- int i, j, base_reg;
+ int i, base_reg;
rtx base_reg_rtx;
HOST_WIDE_INT offset;
int write_back = FALSE;
@@ -14421,14 +14421,8 @@ gen_ldm_seq (rtx *operands, int nops, bool sort_regs)
return false;
if (sort_regs)
- for (i = 0; i < nops - 1; i++)
- for (j = i + 1; j < nops; j++)
- if (regs[i] > regs[j])
- {
- int t = regs[i];
- regs[i] = regs[j];
- regs[j] = t;
- }
+ std::sort (regs, regs + nops);
+
base_reg_rtx = gen_rtx_REG (Pmode, base_reg);
if (TARGET_THUMB1)
reply other threads:[~2015-04-14 12:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=552D0A6E.6080302@arm.com \
--to=kyrylo.tkachov@arm.com \
--cc=Richard.Earnshaw@arm.com \
--cc=gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org \
--cc=ramana.radhakrishnan@arm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).