From: Tom de Vries <Tom_deVries@mentor.com>
To: Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com>
Cc: GCC Patches <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>
Subject: [PR65637][PATCH][2/3] Fix inner loop phi in expand_omp_for_static_chunk
Date: Wed, 15 Apr 2015 13:17:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <552E64EC.5060707@mentor.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <552E6341.4040401@mentor.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1622 bytes --]
On 15-04-15 15:10, Tom de Vries wrote:
> Hi,
>
> This patch series fixes PR65637.
>
> Currently, ssa-handling code in expand_omp_for_static_chunk is dead and not
> exercised by testing.
>
> Ssa-handling code in omp-low.c is only triggered by pass_parallelize_loops, and
> that pass doesn't specify a chunk size on the GIMPLE_OMP_FOR it constructs, so
> that only exercises the expand_omp_for_static_nochunk path.
>
> Using the attached trigger patch, we excercise the ssa-handling code in
> expand_omp_for_static_chunk. The following patch series fixes the problems in
> the ssa-handling code that we encounter.
>
> 1. Fix gcc_assert in expand_omp_for_static_chunk
> 2. Fix inner loop phi in expand_omp_for_static_chunk
> 3. Handle 2 preds for fin_bb in expand_omp_for_static_chunk
>
> The patch series has been bootstrapped and reg-tested on x86_64 together with
> attached trigger patch.
>
> I'll post the patches from the patch series individually, in response to this
> email.
>
This patch fixes an libgomp.c/autopar-1.c execution failure.
For autopar-1.c, the original loop has a loop phi:
...
# s.5_20 = PHI <s.5_12(4), 0.0(20)>
...
After expand_omp_for_static_chunk, there's an inner and an outer loop. The outer
loop phi is:
...
# s.5_11 = PHI <0.0(15), s.5_12(21)>
...
and the inner loop phi is:
...
# s.5_20 = PHI <s.5_12(4), 0.0(20)>
...
The inner loop phi should not have 0.0 as argument, but the result of the outer
loop phi, like this:
...
# s.5_20 = PHI <s.5_12(4), s.5_11(20)>
...
This patch fixes the inner loop phi, and allows the autopar-1.c execution test
to pass.
OK for trunk?
Thanks,
- Tom
[-- Attachment #2: 0003-Fix-inner-loop-phi-in-expand_omp_for_static_chunk.patch --]
[-- Type: text/x-patch, Size: 1747 bytes --]
Fix inner loop phi in expand_omp_for_static_chunk
2015-04-15 Tom de Vries <tom@codesourcery.com>
PR tree-optimization/65637
* omp-low.c (find_phi_with_arg_on_edge): New function.
(expand_omp_for_static_chunk): Fix inner loop phi.
---
gcc/omp-low.c | 25 ++++++++++++++++++++++++-
1 file changed, 24 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/gcc/omp-low.c b/gcc/omp-low.c
index f7b9d11..62cbed0 100644
--- a/gcc/omp-low.c
+++ b/gcc/omp-low.c
@@ -6844,6 +6844,22 @@ expand_omp_for_static_nochunk (struct omp_region *region,
}
}
+static gphi *
+find_phi_with_arg_on_edge (tree arg, edge e)
+{
+ basic_block bb = e->dest;
+
+ for (gphi_iterator gpi = gsi_start_phis (bb);
+ !gsi_end_p (gpi);
+ gsi_next (&gpi))
+ {
+ gphi *phi = gpi.phi ();
+ if (PHI_ARG_DEF_FROM_EDGE (phi, e) == arg)
+ return phi;
+ }
+
+ return NULL;
+}
/* A subroutine of expand_omp_for. Generate code for a parallel
loop with static schedule and a specified chunk size. Given
@@ -7272,7 +7288,14 @@ expand_omp_for_static_chunk (struct omp_region *region,
t = vextra;
add_phi_arg (nphi, t, ene, locus);
locus = redirect_edge_var_map_location (vm);
- add_phi_arg (nphi, redirect_edge_var_map_def (vm), re, locus);
+ tree back_arg = redirect_edge_var_map_def (vm);
+ add_phi_arg (nphi, back_arg, re, locus);
+ gphi *inner_loop_phi
+ = find_phi_with_arg_on_edge (back_arg,
+ find_edge (cont_bb, body_bb));
+ gcc_assert (inner_loop_phi != NULL);
+ add_phi_arg (inner_loop_phi, gimple_phi_result (nphi),
+ find_edge (seq_start_bb, body_bb), locus);
}
gcc_assert (gsi_end_p (psi) && (head == NULL || i == head->length ()));
redirect_edge_var_map_clear (re);
--
1.9.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-04-15 13:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-04-15 13:10 [PR65637] Fix ssa-handling code " Tom de Vries
2015-04-15 13:15 ` [PR65637][PATCH][1/3] Fix gcc_assert " Tom de Vries
2015-08-31 12:00 ` [PR65637][PATCH][3/5] " Tom de Vries
2015-09-03 9:16 ` Jakub Jelinek
2015-04-15 13:17 ` Tom de Vries [this message]
2015-08-31 12:03 ` [PR65637][PATCH][4/5] Fix inner loop phi " Tom de Vries
2015-09-03 9:20 ` Jakub Jelinek
2015-04-15 13:23 ` [PR65637][PATCH][3/3] Handle 2 preds for fin_bb " Tom de Vries
2015-08-31 12:26 ` [PR65637][PATCH][5/5] " Tom de Vries
2015-09-03 9:40 ` Jakub Jelinek
2015-05-18 13:13 ` [PING][PR65637] Fix ssa-handling code " Tom de Vries
2015-05-18 14:19 ` Tom de Vries
2015-06-08 12:34 ` [PING^2][PR65637] " Tom de Vries
2015-08-31 11:44 ` [PR65637] " Tom de Vries
2015-08-31 11:51 ` [PATCH][1/5] Add param parloops-chunk-size Tom de Vries
2015-09-03 8:57 ` Jakub Jelinek
2015-08-31 11:55 ` [PATCH][2/5] Handle simple latch bb in expand_omp_for_static_chunk Tom de Vries
2015-09-03 9:02 ` Jakub Jelinek
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=552E64EC.5060707@mentor.com \
--to=tom_devries@mentor.com \
--cc=gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org \
--cc=jakub@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).