From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-patches-return-396233-listarch-gcc-patches=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 47618 invoked by alias); 28 Apr 2015 17:14:07 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-patches.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 47598 invoked by uid 89); 28 Apr 2015 17:14:06 -0000
Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none
X-Virus-Found: No
X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-1.8 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD autolearn=ham version=3.3.2
X-HELO: mx1.redhat.com
Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with (AES256-GCM-SHA384 encrypted) ESMTPS; Tue, 28 Apr 2015 17:14:05 +0000
Received: from int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.22])	by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id t3SHE3CR018397	(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=FAIL);	Tue, 28 Apr 2015 13:14:04 -0400
Received: from localhost.localdomain (ovpn-113-143.phx2.redhat.com [10.3.113.143])	by int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id t3SHE3ZT015533;	Tue, 28 Apr 2015 13:14:03 -0400
Message-ID: <553FBFDB.4030800@redhat.com>
Date: Tue, 28 Apr 2015 17:16:00 -0000
From: Jeff Law <law@redhat.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.5.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Caroline Tice <cmtice@google.com>, David Edelsohn <dje.gcc@gmail.com>
CC: GCC Patches <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fix size & type for cold partition names (hot-cold function partitioning)
References: <CAGWvny=Ezy9MqJ1p_y4hbdnzHMQ6cHijPxZ7PPPAeE5_K=74rw@mail.gmail.com> <CABtf2+TZhW_LvBoCQxFtBbiw=E_9XNd6MFUd0rW50XhbOszK_g@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CABtf2+TZhW_LvBoCQxFtBbiw=E_9XNd6MFUd0rW50XhbOszK_g@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-IsSubscribed: yes
X-SW-Source: 2015-04/txt/msg01773.txt.bz2

On 04/28/2015 11:12 AM, Caroline Tice wrote:
> Yes, this is already mentioned in PR 65910
> (https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65910).
>
> There is a patch mentioned in that PR that both appears to fix the
> problem and appears to have been approved.  I thought the author of
> the patch would commit it, but that does not appear to have happened
> yet.  Should I go ahead and commit that patch, or should I wait for
> the author to do that?
If it's not committed, go ahead and do so.

jeff