From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-patches-return-396309-listarch-gcc-patches=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 31627 invoked by alias); 29 Apr 2015 10:06:10 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-patches.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 31615 invoked by uid 89); 29 Apr 2015 10:06:09 -0000
Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none
X-Virus-Found: No
X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-1.8 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2
X-HELO: eu-smtp-delivery-143.mimecast.com
Received: from eu-smtp-delivery-143.mimecast.com (HELO eu-smtp-delivery-143.mimecast.com) (146.101.78.143) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Wed, 29 Apr 2015 10:06:08 +0000
Received: from cam-owa1.Emea.Arm.com (fw-tnat.cambridge.arm.com [217.140.96.140]) by uk-mta-13.uk.mimecast.lan; Wed, 29 Apr 2015 11:06:03 +0100
Received: from [10.2.207.50] ([10.1.2.79]) by cam-owa1.Emea.Arm.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959);	 Wed, 29 Apr 2015 11:06:03 +0100
Message-ID: <5540AD09.5010206@arm.com>
Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2015 10:26:00 -0000
From: Kyrill Tkachov <kyrylo.tkachov@arm.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.2.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Yvan Roux <yvan.roux@linaro.org>,  "gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org" <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH, ARM] Fix for pr65924
References: <CAD57uCf9ax1VUzJqFwqw_0mcFytwwzEg7Dj9AMbadX3abb8g+A@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAD57uCf9ax1VUzJqFwqw_0mcFytwwzEg7Dj9AMbadX3abb8g+A@mail.gmail.com>
X-MC-Unique: MUv94jipQLq0QdAnyZtSSA-1
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-IsSubscribed: yes
X-SW-Source: 2015-04/txt/msg01849.txt.bz2

Hi Yvan,

On 29/04/15 09:57, Yvan Roux wrote:
> Hi,
>
> here is the patch for PR65924, only tested on the original testcase so fa=
r.

Can you please double check that the problem doesn't appear
in the other patterns you touched with your cleanup patch?
i.e. that you don't do match_operand on an out-of-bounds operand number?

Thanks,
Kyrill

>
> Thanks
> Yvan
>
> gcc/
> 2015-04-29  Yvan Roux  <yvan.roux@linaro.org>
>
>      PR target/65924
>      * config/arm/thumb2.md (*thumb2_addsi3_compare0_scratch): Fix operand
>      number in type attribute expression.
>
> gcc/testsuite/
> 2015-04-29  Yvan Roux  <yvan.roux@linaro.org>
>
>      PR target/65924
>      gcc.target/arm/pr65924.c: New test.