From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 28609 invoked by alias); 1 May 2015 20:34:51 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 28586 invoked by uid 89); 1 May 2015 20:34:51 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-2.1 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 X-HELO: relay1.mentorg.com Received: from relay1.mentorg.com (HELO relay1.mentorg.com) (192.94.38.131) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Fri, 01 May 2015 20:34:50 +0000 Received: from svr-orw-fem-02x.mgc.mentorg.com ([147.34.96.206] helo=SVR-ORW-FEM-02.mgc.mentorg.com) by relay1.mentorg.com with esmtp id 1YoHe2-0004uy-7i from Sandra_Loosemore@mentor.com ; Fri, 01 May 2015 13:34:46 -0700 Received: from [IPv6:::1] (147.34.91.1) by svr-orw-fem-02.mgc.mentorg.com (147.34.96.168) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.3.224.2; Fri, 1 May 2015 13:34:45 -0700 Message-ID: <5543E328.80205@codesourcery.com> Date: Fri, 01 May 2015 20:34:00 -0000 From: Sandra Loosemore User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130329 Thunderbird/17.0.5 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Jeff Law CC: GCC Patches , , , Jeff Prothero Subject: Re: [rfc, stage 1] default to -fno-delete-null-pointer-checks on nios2-elf References: <551852E1.6050505@codesourcery.com> <552F3DA7.5090305@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <552F3DA7.5090305@redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2015-05/txt/msg00100.txt.bz2 Re https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2015-03/msg01510.html : On 04/15/2015 10:42 PM, Jeff Law wrote: > It looks very sane to me. This is probably how the AVR and CR16 should > have been handled to begin with IMHO. > > FWIW, I generally discourage ports overriding default options, but this > is a case where I believe it makes some sense. > > Please move forward with an official submission. I've now bootstrapped and regression-tested the previously posted patch on x86_64-linux-gnu, as well as retesting it on nios2-elf after updating my source tree to current mainline head. Are the target-independent parts OK to commit? -Sandra