From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 107776 invoked by alias); 4 May 2015 17:13:38 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 107708 invoked by uid 89); 4 May 2015 17:13:38 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-1.8 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 X-HELO: mx1.redhat.com Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with (AES256-GCM-SHA384 encrypted) ESMTPS; Mon, 04 May 2015 17:13:37 +0000 Received: from int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.22]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id t44HDZl9028815 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=FAIL); Mon, 4 May 2015 13:13:35 -0400 Received: from localhost.localdomain (ovpn-113-143.phx2.redhat.com [10.3.113.143]) by int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id t44HDZXq001122; Mon, 4 May 2015 13:13:35 -0400 Message-ID: <5547A8BF.2080701@redhat.com> Date: Mon, 04 May 2015 17:13:00 -0000 From: Jeff Law User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.5.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org, Andreas Krebbel Subject: Re: [PATCH] Remove dead code. References: <20150504115021.GA29913@linux.vnet.ibm.com> In-Reply-To: <20150504115021.GA29913@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2015-05/txt/msg00235.txt.bz2 On 05/04/2015 05:50 AM, Dominik Vogt wrote: > This patch removes a "write only" variable from the C++ code. > > ChangeLog: > > -- > > 2015-05-04 Dominik Vogt > > * call.c (print_z_candidates): Remove dead code. OK. Please install. FWIW, removing a write-only variable seems like it ought ot fall under the obvious rule. jeff