* [C++ Patch] PR 66007
@ 2015-05-04 18:17 Paolo Carlini
2015-05-04 20:29 ` Jason Merrill
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Paolo Carlini @ 2015-05-04 18:17 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-patches; +Cc: Jason Merrill, Jakub Jelinek
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 506 bytes --]
Hi,
unfortunately we have to return to these few lines of code :(
This regression is a more subtle variant of c++/65858: if the user
passes -Wno-error=narrowing the pedwarn didn't result in an actual error
(even if we are forcing -pedantic-errors around it) but produces anyway
a warning, thus returns true, and ok isn't set to true, thus we have a
miscompilation in this case too. Jakub suggested simply checking by hand
errorcount, which passes all my tests.
Thanks,
Paolo.
////////////////////
[-- Attachment #2: CL_66007 --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 366 bytes --]
/cp
2015-05-04 Paolo Carlini <paolo.carlini@oracle.com>
Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com>
PR c++/66007
* typeck2.c (check_narrowing): Check by-hand that the pedwarn didn't
result in an actual error.
/testsuite
2015-05-04 Paolo Carlini <paolo.carlini@oracle.com>
Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com>
PR c++/66007
* g++.dg/cpp0x/Wnarrowing4.C: New.
[-- Attachment #3: patch_66007 --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 1334 bytes --]
Index: cp/typeck2.c
===================================================================
--- cp/typeck2.c (revision 222767)
+++ cp/typeck2.c (working copy)
@@ -958,10 +958,12 @@ check_narrowing (tree type, tree init, tsubst_flag
}
else if (complain & tf_error)
{
+ int savederrorcount = errorcount;
global_dc->pedantic_errors = 1;
- if (!pedwarn (EXPR_LOC_OR_LOC (init, input_location), OPT_Wnarrowing,
- "narrowing conversion of %qE from %qT to %qT "
- "inside { }", init, ftype, type))
+ pedwarn (EXPR_LOC_OR_LOC (init, input_location), OPT_Wnarrowing,
+ "narrowing conversion of %qE from %qT to %qT "
+ "inside { }", init, ftype, type);
+ if (errorcount == savederrorcount)
ok = true;
global_dc->pedantic_errors = flag_pedantic_errors;
}
Index: testsuite/g++.dg/cpp0x/Wnarrowing4.C
===================================================================
--- testsuite/g++.dg/cpp0x/Wnarrowing4.C (revision 0)
+++ testsuite/g++.dg/cpp0x/Wnarrowing4.C (working copy)
@@ -0,0 +1,14 @@
+// PR c++/66007
+// { dg-do run { target c++11 } }
+// { dg-options "-Wno-error=narrowing" }
+
+extern "C" void abort();
+
+int main()
+{
+ unsigned foo[] = { 1, -1, 3 };
+ if (foo[0] != 1 || foo[1] != __INT_MAX__ * 2U + 1 || foo[2] != 3)
+ abort();
+}
+
+// { dg-prune-output "narrowing conversion" }
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* Re: [C++ Patch] PR 66007
2015-05-04 18:17 [C++ Patch] PR 66007 Paolo Carlini
@ 2015-05-04 20:29 ` Jason Merrill
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Jason Merrill @ 2015-05-04 20:29 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Paolo Carlini, gcc-patches; +Cc: Jakub Jelinek
On 05/04/2015 01:17 PM, Paolo Carlini wrote:
> This regression is a more subtle variant of c++/65858: if the user
> passes -Wno-error=narrowing the pedwarn didn't result in an actual error
> (even if we are forcing -pedantic-errors around it) but produces anyway
> a warning, thus returns true, and ok isn't set to true, thus we have a
> miscompilation in this case too. Jakub suggested simply checking by hand
> errorcount, which passes all my tests.
OK.
Jason
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2015-05-04 20:29 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2015-05-04 18:17 [C++ Patch] PR 66007 Paolo Carlini
2015-05-04 20:29 ` Jason Merrill
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).