* [PATCH][AArch64] PR target/65491: Classify V1TF vectors as AAPCS64 short vectors rather than composite types
@ 2015-04-20 10:16 Kyrill Tkachov
2015-05-06 9:58 ` Kyrill Tkachov
2015-05-19 11:21 ` James Greenhalgh
0 siblings, 2 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Kyrill Tkachov @ 2015-04-20 10:16 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-patches; +Cc: Marcus Shawcroft, Richard Earnshaw, James Greenhalgh
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1469 bytes --]
Hi all,
The ICE in the PR happens when we pass a 1x(128-bit float) vector as an
argument.
The aarch64 backend erroneously classifies it as a composite type when in
fact it
is a short vector according to AAPCS64
(section 4.1.2 from
http://infocenter.arm.com/help/topic/com.arm.doc.ihi0055b/IHI0055B_aapcs64.p
df).
The solution in this patch is to check aarch64_composite_type_p for a short
vector with
aarch64_short_vector_p rather than the other way around (check for
aarch64_short_vector_p
in aarch64_composite_type_p).
With this patch the testcase compiles fine and in the generated code the
argument is passed
in the simd registers like the ABI requires.
Bootstrapped and tested on aarch64-linux.
This bug appears on all release branches so it's not a regression.
Ok for trunk?
Do we want this in the release branches eventually?
Thanks,
Kyrill
2015-04-20 Kyrylo Tkachov <kyrylo.tkachov@arm.com>
PR target/65491
* config/aarch64/aarch64.c (aarch64_short_vector_p): Move above
aarch64_composite_type_p. Remove check for aarch64_composite_type_p.
(aarch64_composite_type_p): Return false if given type and mode are
for a short vector.
2015-04-20 Kyrylo Tkachov <kyrylo.tkachov@arm.com>
PR target/65491
* gcc.target/aarch64/pr65491_1.c: New test.
* gcc.target/aarch64/aapcs64/type-def.h (vlf1_t): New typedef.
* gcc.target/aarch64/aapcs64/func-ret-1.c: Add test for vlf1_t.
[-- Attachment #2: aarch64-v1tf-aapcs.patch --]
[-- Type: application/octet-stream, Size: 4429 bytes --]
commit 96913fdb9fd1a3cf53a7e5fc0ee2039f3de980bf
Author: Kyrylo Tkachov <kyrylo.tkachov@arm.com>
Date: Fri Mar 20 16:26:35 2015 +0000
[AArch64] PR target/65491: Classify V1TF vectors as AAPCS64 short vectors rather than composite types
diff --git a/gcc/config/aarch64/aarch64.c b/gcc/config/aarch64/aarch64.c
index 747bf6a..5a7efbd 100644
--- a/gcc/config/aarch64/aarch64.c
+++ b/gcc/config/aarch64/aarch64.c
@@ -8027,6 +8027,26 @@ aapcs_vfp_sub_candidate (const_tree type, machine_mode *modep)
return -1;
}
+/* Return TRUE if the type, as described by TYPE and MODE, is a short vector
+ type as described in AAPCS64 \S 4.1.2.
+
+ See the comment above aarch64_composite_type_p for the notes on MODE. */
+
+static bool
+aarch64_short_vector_p (const_tree type,
+ machine_mode mode)
+{
+ HOST_WIDE_INT size = -1;
+
+ if (type && TREE_CODE (type) == VECTOR_TYPE)
+ size = int_size_in_bytes (type);
+ else if (GET_MODE_CLASS (mode) == MODE_VECTOR_INT
+ || GET_MODE_CLASS (mode) == MODE_VECTOR_FLOAT)
+ size = GET_MODE_SIZE (mode);
+
+ return (size == 8 || size == 16);
+}
+
/* Return TRUE if the type, as described by TYPE and MODE, is a composite
type as described in AAPCS64 \S 4.3. This includes aggregate, union and
array types. The C99 floating-point complex types are also considered
@@ -8048,6 +8068,9 @@ static bool
aarch64_composite_type_p (const_tree type,
machine_mode mode)
{
+ if (aarch64_short_vector_p (type, mode))
+ return false;
+
if (type && (AGGREGATE_TYPE_P (type) || TREE_CODE (type) == COMPLEX_TYPE))
return true;
@@ -8059,27 +8082,6 @@ aarch64_composite_type_p (const_tree type,
return false;
}
-/* Return TRUE if the type, as described by TYPE and MODE, is a short vector
- type as described in AAPCS64 \S 4.1.2.
-
- See the comment above aarch64_composite_type_p for the notes on MODE. */
-
-static bool
-aarch64_short_vector_p (const_tree type,
- machine_mode mode)
-{
- HOST_WIDE_INT size = -1;
-
- if (type && TREE_CODE (type) == VECTOR_TYPE)
- size = int_size_in_bytes (type);
- else if (!aarch64_composite_type_p (type, mode)
- && (GET_MODE_CLASS (mode) == MODE_VECTOR_INT
- || GET_MODE_CLASS (mode) == MODE_VECTOR_FLOAT))
- size = GET_MODE_SIZE (mode);
-
- return (size == 8 || size == 16) ? true : false;
-}
-
/* Return TRUE if an argument, whose type is described by TYPE and MODE,
shall be passed or returned in simd/fp register(s) (providing these
parameter passing registers are available).
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/aarch64/aapcs64/func-ret-1.c b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/aarch64/aapcs64/func-ret-1.c
index 16b5c1e..a21c926 100644
--- a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/aarch64/aapcs64/func-ret-1.c
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/aarch64/aapcs64/func-ret-1.c
@@ -12,6 +12,8 @@
vf2_t vf2 = (vf2_t){ 17.f, 18.f };
vi4_t vi4 = (vi4_t){ 0xdeadbabe, 0xbabecafe, 0xcafebeef, 0xbeefdead };
+vlf1_t vlf1 = (vlf1_t) { 17.0 };
+
union int128_t qword;
int *int_ptr = (int *)0xabcdef0123456789ULL;
@@ -41,4 +43,5 @@ FUNC_VAL_CHECK (11, long double, 98765432123456789.987654321L, Q0, flat)
FUNC_VAL_CHECK (12, vf2_t, vf2, D0, f32in64)
FUNC_VAL_CHECK (13, vi4_t, vi4, Q0, i32in128)
FUNC_VAL_CHECK (14, int *, int_ptr, X0, flat)
+FUNC_VAL_CHECK (15, vlf1_t, vlf1, Q0, flat)
#endif
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/aarch64/aapcs64/type-def.h b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/aarch64/aapcs64/type-def.h
index 07e56ff..3b9b349 100644
--- a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/aarch64/aapcs64/type-def.h
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/aarch64/aapcs64/type-def.h
@@ -10,6 +10,9 @@ typedef float vf4_t __attribute__((vector_size (16)));
/* 128-bit vector of 4 ints. */
typedef int vi4_t __attribute__((vector_size (16)));
+/* 128-bit vector of 1 quad precision float. */
+typedef long double vlf1_t __attribute__((vector_size (16)));
+
/* signed quad-word (in an union for the convenience of initialization). */
union int128_t
{
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/aarch64/pr65491_1.c b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/aarch64/pr65491_1.c
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..a548afb1
--- /dev/null
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/aarch64/pr65491_1.c
@@ -0,0 +1,11 @@
+/* { dg-do compile } */
+/* { dg-options "-O2" } */
+
+typedef long double a __attribute__((vector_size (16)));
+
+a
+sum (a first, a second)
+{
+ return first + second;
+}
+
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH][AArch64] PR target/65491: Classify V1TF vectors as AAPCS64 short vectors rather than composite types
2015-04-20 10:16 [PATCH][AArch64] PR target/65491: Classify V1TF vectors as AAPCS64 short vectors rather than composite types Kyrill Tkachov
@ 2015-05-06 9:58 ` Kyrill Tkachov
2015-05-12 9:07 ` Kyrill Tkachov
2015-05-19 11:21 ` James Greenhalgh
1 sibling, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Kyrill Tkachov @ 2015-05-06 9:58 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-patches; +Cc: Marcus Shawcroft, Richard Earnshaw, James Greenhalgh
Ping.
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2015-04/msg01004.html
Thanks,
Kyrill
On 20/04/15 11:16, Kyrill Tkachov wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> The ICE in the PR happens when we pass a 1x(128-bit float) vector as an
> argument.
> The aarch64 backend erroneously classifies it as a composite type when in
> fact it
> is a short vector according to AAPCS64
> (section 4.1.2 from
> http://infocenter.arm.com/help/topic/com.arm.doc.ihi0055b/IHI0055B_aapcs64.p
> df).
>
> The solution in this patch is to check aarch64_composite_type_p for a short
> vector with
> aarch64_short_vector_p rather than the other way around (check for
> aarch64_short_vector_p
> in aarch64_composite_type_p).
>
> With this patch the testcase compiles fine and in the generated code the
> argument is passed
> in the simd registers like the ABI requires.
>
> Bootstrapped and tested on aarch64-linux.
>
> This bug appears on all release branches so it's not a regression.
> Ok for trunk?
> Do we want this in the release branches eventually?
>
> Thanks,
> Kyrill
>
> 2015-04-20 Kyrylo Tkachov <kyrylo.tkachov@arm.com>
>
> PR target/65491
> * config/aarch64/aarch64.c (aarch64_short_vector_p): Move above
> aarch64_composite_type_p. Remove check for aarch64_composite_type_p.
> (aarch64_composite_type_p): Return false if given type and mode are
> for a short vector.
>
> 2015-04-20 Kyrylo Tkachov <kyrylo.tkachov@arm.com>
>
> PR target/65491
> * gcc.target/aarch64/pr65491_1.c: New test.
> * gcc.target/aarch64/aapcs64/type-def.h (vlf1_t): New typedef.
> * gcc.target/aarch64/aapcs64/func-ret-1.c: Add test for vlf1_t.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH][AArch64] PR target/65491: Classify V1TF vectors as AAPCS64 short vectors rather than composite types
2015-05-06 9:58 ` Kyrill Tkachov
@ 2015-05-12 9:07 ` Kyrill Tkachov
2015-05-18 10:09 ` Kyrill Tkachov
0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Kyrill Tkachov @ 2015-05-12 9:07 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-patches; +Cc: Marcus Shawcroft, Richard Earnshaw, James Greenhalgh
Ping^2.
Thanks,
Kyrill
On 06/05/15 10:57, Kyrill Tkachov wrote:
> Ping.
> https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2015-04/msg01004.html
>
> Thanks,
> Kyrill
>
> On 20/04/15 11:16, Kyrill Tkachov wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> The ICE in the PR happens when we pass a 1x(128-bit float) vector as an
>> argument.
>> The aarch64 backend erroneously classifies it as a composite type when in
>> fact it
>> is a short vector according to AAPCS64
>> (section 4.1.2 from
>> http://infocenter.arm.com/help/topic/com.arm.doc.ihi0055b/IHI0055B_aapcs64.p
>> df).
>>
>> The solution in this patch is to check aarch64_composite_type_p for a short
>> vector with
>> aarch64_short_vector_p rather than the other way around (check for
>> aarch64_short_vector_p
>> in aarch64_composite_type_p).
>>
>> With this patch the testcase compiles fine and in the generated code the
>> argument is passed
>> in the simd registers like the ABI requires.
>>
>> Bootstrapped and tested on aarch64-linux.
>>
>> This bug appears on all release branches so it's not a regression.
>> Ok for trunk?
>> Do we want this in the release branches eventually?
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Kyrill
>>
>> 2015-04-20 Kyrylo Tkachov <kyrylo.tkachov@arm.com>
>>
>> PR target/65491
>> * config/aarch64/aarch64.c (aarch64_short_vector_p): Move above
>> aarch64_composite_type_p. Remove check for aarch64_composite_type_p.
>> (aarch64_composite_type_p): Return false if given type and mode are
>> for a short vector.
>>
>> 2015-04-20 Kyrylo Tkachov <kyrylo.tkachov@arm.com>
>>
>> PR target/65491
>> * gcc.target/aarch64/pr65491_1.c: New test.
>> * gcc.target/aarch64/aapcs64/type-def.h (vlf1_t): New typedef.
>> * gcc.target/aarch64/aapcs64/func-ret-1.c: Add test for vlf1_t.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH][AArch64] PR target/65491: Classify V1TF vectors as AAPCS64 short vectors rather than composite types
2015-05-12 9:07 ` Kyrill Tkachov
@ 2015-05-18 10:09 ` Kyrill Tkachov
0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Kyrill Tkachov @ 2015-05-18 10:09 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-patches; +Cc: Marcus Shawcroft, Richard Earnshaw, James Greenhalgh
Ping^3.
Thanks,
Kyrill
On 12/05/15 10:06, Kyrill Tkachov wrote:
> Ping^2.
>
> Thanks,
> Kyrill
>
> On 06/05/15 10:57, Kyrill Tkachov wrote:
>> Ping.
>> https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2015-04/msg01004.html
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Kyrill
>>
>> On 20/04/15 11:16, Kyrill Tkachov wrote:
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> The ICE in the PR happens when we pass a 1x(128-bit float) vector as an
>>> argument.
>>> The aarch64 backend erroneously classifies it as a composite type when in
>>> fact it
>>> is a short vector according to AAPCS64
>>> (section 4.1.2 from
>>> http://infocenter.arm.com/help/topic/com.arm.doc.ihi0055b/IHI0055B_aapcs64.p
>>> df).
>>>
>>> The solution in this patch is to check aarch64_composite_type_p for a short
>>> vector with
>>> aarch64_short_vector_p rather than the other way around (check for
>>> aarch64_short_vector_p
>>> in aarch64_composite_type_p).
>>>
>>> With this patch the testcase compiles fine and in the generated code the
>>> argument is passed
>>> in the simd registers like the ABI requires.
>>>
>>> Bootstrapped and tested on aarch64-linux.
>>>
>>> This bug appears on all release branches so it's not a regression.
>>> Ok for trunk?
>>> Do we want this in the release branches eventually?
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Kyrill
>>>
>>> 2015-04-20 Kyrylo Tkachov <kyrylo.tkachov@arm.com>
>>>
>>> PR target/65491
>>> * config/aarch64/aarch64.c (aarch64_short_vector_p): Move above
>>> aarch64_composite_type_p. Remove check for aarch64_composite_type_p.
>>> (aarch64_composite_type_p): Return false if given type and mode are
>>> for a short vector.
>>>
>>> 2015-04-20 Kyrylo Tkachov <kyrylo.tkachov@arm.com>
>>>
>>> PR target/65491
>>> * gcc.target/aarch64/pr65491_1.c: New test.
>>> * gcc.target/aarch64/aapcs64/type-def.h (vlf1_t): New typedef.
>>> * gcc.target/aarch64/aapcs64/func-ret-1.c: Add test for vlf1_t.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH][AArch64] PR target/65491: Classify V1TF vectors as AAPCS64 short vectors rather than composite types
2015-04-20 10:16 [PATCH][AArch64] PR target/65491: Classify V1TF vectors as AAPCS64 short vectors rather than composite types Kyrill Tkachov
2015-05-06 9:58 ` Kyrill Tkachov
@ 2015-05-19 11:21 ` James Greenhalgh
2015-05-22 14:49 ` Kyrill Tkachov
1 sibling, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: James Greenhalgh @ 2015-05-19 11:21 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Kyrylo Tkachov; +Cc: gcc-patches, Marcus Shawcroft, Richard Earnshaw
On Mon, Apr 20, 2015 at 11:16:02AM +0100, Kyrylo Tkachov wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> The ICE in the PR happens when we pass a 1x(128-bit float) vector as an
> argument.
> The aarch64 backend erroneously classifies it as a composite type when in
> fact it
> is a short vector according to AAPCS64
> (section 4.1.2 from
> http://infocenter.arm.com/help/topic/com.arm.doc.ihi0055b/IHI0055B_aapcs64.p
> df).
Agreed.
>
> The solution in this patch is to check aarch64_composite_type_p for a short
> vector with
> aarch64_short_vector_p rather than the other way around (check for
> aarch64_short_vector_p
> in aarch64_composite_type_p).
I think I understand what you are saying, but your patch does the
opposite (ADDS a check for aarch64_short_vector_p in
aarch64_composite_type_p, REMOVES a check for aarch64_composite_type_p,
in aarch64_short_vector_p)...
This logic is pretty hairy, and I'm struggling to convince myself that
your change only hits the bug you described above. I think I've worked
it through and it does, but if you can find any additional ABI tests
which stress the Vector/Floating-Point passing rules that would help
settle my nerves.
The patch is OK. I wouldn't think we would want to backport it to
release branches as there is no regression to fix.
Thanks,
James
> 2015-04-20 Kyrylo Tkachov <kyrylo.tkachov@arm.com>
>
> PR target/65491
> * config/aarch64/aarch64.c (aarch64_short_vector_p): Move above
> aarch64_composite_type_p. Remove check for aarch64_composite_type_p.
> (aarch64_composite_type_p): Return false if given type and mode are
> for a short vector.
>
> 2015-04-20 Kyrylo Tkachov <kyrylo.tkachov@arm.com>
>
> PR target/65491
> * gcc.target/aarch64/pr65491_1.c: New test.
> * gcc.target/aarch64/aapcs64/type-def.h (vlf1_t): New typedef.
> * gcc.target/aarch64/aapcs64/func-ret-1.c: Add test for vlf1_t.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH][AArch64] PR target/65491: Classify V1TF vectors as AAPCS64 short vectors rather than composite types
2015-05-19 11:21 ` James Greenhalgh
@ 2015-05-22 14:49 ` Kyrill Tkachov
0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Kyrill Tkachov @ 2015-05-22 14:49 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: James Greenhalgh; +Cc: gcc-patches, Marcus Shawcroft, Richard Earnshaw
Hi James,
On 19/05/15 12:18, James Greenhalgh wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 20, 2015 at 11:16:02AM +0100, Kyrylo Tkachov wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> The ICE in the PR happens when we pass a 1x(128-bit float) vector as an
>> argument.
>> The aarch64 backend erroneously classifies it as a composite type when in
>> fact it
>> is a short vector according to AAPCS64
>> (section 4.1.2 from
>> http://infocenter.arm.com/help/topic/com.arm.doc.ihi0055b/IHI0055B_aapcs64.p
>> df).
> Agreed.
>
>> The solution in this patch is to check aarch64_composite_type_p for a short
>> vector with
>> aarch64_short_vector_p rather than the other way around (check for
>> aarch64_short_vector_p
>> in aarch64_composite_type_p).
> I think I understand what you are saying, but your patch does the
> opposite (ADDS a check for aarch64_short_vector_p in
> aarch64_composite_type_p, REMOVES a check for aarch64_composite_type_p,
> in aarch64_short_vector_p)...
Yeah, I just worded it wrong in the cover letter, sorry about that.
As you say, the logic is pretty hairy.
>
> This logic is pretty hairy, and I'm struggling to convince myself that
> your change only hits the bug you described above. I think I've worked
> it through and it does, but if you can find any additional ABI tests
> which stress the Vector/Floating-Point passing rules that would help
> settle my nerves.
The aapcs64.exp stuff seems to test the existing rules
quite well...
>
> The patch is OK. I wouldn't think we would want to backport it to
> release branches as there is no regression to fix.
Ok, I've committed it with r223577.
I agree that it's not a regression fix, so messing with ABI code
in the release branches is not desirable.
Thanks for the review.
Kyrill
>
> Thanks,
> James
>
>> 2015-04-20 Kyrylo Tkachov <kyrylo.tkachov@arm.com>
>>
>> PR target/65491
>> * config/aarch64/aarch64.c (aarch64_short_vector_p): Move above
>> aarch64_composite_type_p. Remove check for aarch64_composite_type_p.
>> (aarch64_composite_type_p): Return false if given type and mode are
>> for a short vector.
>>
>> 2015-04-20 Kyrylo Tkachov <kyrylo.tkachov@arm.com>
>>
>> PR target/65491
>> * gcc.target/aarch64/pr65491_1.c: New test.
>> * gcc.target/aarch64/aapcs64/type-def.h (vlf1_t): New typedef.
>> * gcc.target/aarch64/aapcs64/func-ret-1.c: Add test for vlf1_t.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2015-05-22 14:39 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2015-04-20 10:16 [PATCH][AArch64] PR target/65491: Classify V1TF vectors as AAPCS64 short vectors rather than composite types Kyrill Tkachov
2015-05-06 9:58 ` Kyrill Tkachov
2015-05-12 9:07 ` Kyrill Tkachov
2015-05-18 10:09 ` Kyrill Tkachov
2015-05-19 11:21 ` James Greenhalgh
2015-05-22 14:49 ` Kyrill Tkachov
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).