From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 114187 invoked by alias); 12 May 2015 15:51:01 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 113399 invoked by uid 89); 12 May 2015 15:51:01 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-2.3 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 X-HELO: relay1.mentorg.com Received: from relay1.mentorg.com (HELO relay1.mentorg.com) (192.94.38.131) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Tue, 12 May 2015 15:50:59 +0000 Received: from nat-ies.mentorg.com ([192.94.31.2] helo=SVR-IES-FEM-01.mgc.mentorg.com) by relay1.mentorg.com with esmtp id 1YsCSN-0006ix-1d from Tom_deVries@mentor.com ; Tue, 12 May 2015 08:50:55 -0700 Received: from [127.0.0.1] (137.202.0.76) by SVR-IES-FEM-01.mgc.mentorg.com (137.202.0.104) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.3.224.2; Tue, 12 May 2015 16:50:53 +0100 Message-ID: <5552215A.6010005@mentor.com> Date: Tue, 12 May 2015 15:58:00 -0000 From: Tom de Vries User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Yury Gribov , CC: Diego Novillo , GCC Patches , Jeff Law Subject: Re: [PATCH][PING^2] Skip preprocessor directives in mklog References: <553633FB.3050206@samsung.com> <5541EFCE.3070004@samsung.com> <555219FC.8090703@samsung.com> <55521D48.2050302@samsung.com> In-Reply-To: <55521D48.2050302@samsung.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2015-05/txt/msg01111.txt.bz2 On 12-05-15 17:33, Yury Gribov wrote: > On 05/12/2015 06:23 PM, Diego Novillo wrote: >> The patch looks fine to me. >> >> I'm not really involved in GCC development anymore. I would suggest >> that this script should be maintained by whoever's been hacking on it >> the most. It's a simple script, so it shouldn't be hard to find a new >> maintainer for it. > > Trevor, Tom, > > Does anyone want to volunteer? > I'm not a good choice to be the maintainer of a perl script. I have very limited knowledge of it, and look at perl code maybe once per year. So I'm unvolunteering myself. Thanks, - Tom