From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 91286 invoked by alias); 12 May 2015 19:45:09 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 91276 invoked by uid 89); 12 May 2015 19:45:08 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-1.8 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 X-HELO: mx1.redhat.com Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with (AES256-GCM-SHA384 encrypted) ESMTPS; Tue, 12 May 2015 19:45:07 +0000 Received: from int-mx10.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx10.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.23]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id t4CJj5HQ018710 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=FAIL); Tue, 12 May 2015 15:45:06 -0400 Received: from localhost.localdomain (ovpn-113-21.phx2.redhat.com [10.3.113.21]) by int-mx10.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id t4CJj4jV013007; Tue, 12 May 2015 15:45:04 -0400 Message-ID: <55525840.6050704@redhat.com> Date: Tue, 12 May 2015 19:59:00 -0000 From: Jeff Law User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.5.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Yury Gribov , Trevor Saunders CC: Tom de Vries , Diego Novillo , GCC Patches Subject: Re: [PATCH][PING^2] Skip preprocessor directives in mklog References: <553633FB.3050206@samsung.com> <5541EFCE.3070004@samsung.com> <555219FC.8090703@samsung.com> <55521D48.2050302@samsung.com> <20150512155731.GA31257@tsaunders-iceball.corp.tor1.mozilla.com> <555226D1.6080008@samsung.com> In-Reply-To: <555226D1.6080008@samsung.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2015-05/txt/msg01138.txt.bz2 On 05/12/2015 10:14 AM, Yury Gribov wrote: > On 05/12/2015 06:57 PM, Trevor Saunders wrote: >> On Tue, May 12, 2015 at 06:33:28PM +0300, Yury Gribov wrote: >>> On 05/12/2015 06:23 PM, Diego Novillo wrote: >>>> The patch looks fine to me. >>>> >>>> I'm not really involved in GCC development anymore. I would suggest >>>> that this script should be maintained by whoever's been hacking on it >>>> the most. It's a simple script, so it shouldn't be hard to find a new >>>> maintainer for it. >>> >>> Trevor, Tom, >>> >>> Does anyone want to volunteer? >> >> I think you'd be the best choice :) >> >> I read about as much perl as Tom, but given you've tested it and it >> seems sane I'll say ok if you want me to. > > Hm, looks like I'm the only one who perls here. What should I do to > become a maintainer? I think we have our volunteer :-) Jeff