From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-patches-return-398267-listarch-gcc-patches=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 71940 invoked by alias); 19 May 2015 15:02:45 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-patches.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 71929 invoked by uid 89); 19 May 2015 15:02:45 -0000
Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none
X-Virus-Found: No
X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KAM_LAZY_DOMAIN_SECURITY,SPF_HELO_PASS,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD autolearn=no version=3.3.2
X-HELO: mx1.redhat.com
Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with (AES256-GCM-SHA384 encrypted) ESMTPS; Tue, 19 May 2015 15:02:41 +0000
Received: from int-mx14.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx14.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.27])	by mx1.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F35BE8EFF2;	Tue, 19 May 2015 15:02:39 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from localhost.localdomain (ovpn-113-21.phx2.redhat.com [10.3.113.21])	by int-mx14.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id t4JF2dDk027769;	Tue, 19 May 2015 11:02:39 -0400
Message-ID: <555B508E.4010103@redhat.com>
Date: Tue, 19 May 2015 15:11:00 -0000
From: Jeff Law <law@redhat.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.5.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Michael Matz <matz@suse.de>, Rich Felker <dalias@libc.org>
CC: "H.J. Lu" <hjl.tools@gmail.com>, Jan Hubicka <hubicka@ucw.cz>,        Alexander Monakov <amonakov@ispras.ru>,        GCC Patches <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>, Uros Bizjak <ubizjak@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH i386] Allow sibcalls in no-PLT PIC
References: <alpine.LNX.2.11.1505151927170.22867@monopod.intra.ispras.ru> <CAMe9rOq+gfTcCoY4AKefkZgysHr_XXOaCtOFWDro8OeT+mBUWQ@mail.gmail.com> <20150515194824.GB14415@kam.mff.cuni.cz> <CAMe9rOr3yQv-+cJxwp_YfNY=9G+FnV6=JdYh_T6kPDJtSA0fzg@mail.gmail.com> <20150515202319.GE17573@brightrain.aerifal.cx> <CAMe9rOqRBz7L6Fr1nxDVrTEh3EQ-AVV0dMCC0-xdpq87k=e4EQ@mail.gmail.com> <20150515204237.GF17573@brightrain.aerifal.cx> <CAMe9rOp1ibVzf0KOt+1boOxb5ag85fe2Rv2Rst=CgAtOTGFBxA@mail.gmail.com> <20150515230810.GA73210@kam.mff.cuni.cz> <CAMe9rOr1_r0tvi_JdsCL8w-MMAqhSeVpA6sbksnn1yP224zn_A@mail.gmail.com> <20150515234403.GG17573@brightrain.aerifal.cx> <alpine.LSU.2.20.1505191637140.27315@wotan.suse.de>
In-Reply-To: <alpine.LSU.2.20.1505191637140.27315@wotan.suse.de>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-IsSubscribed: yes
X-SW-Source: 2015-05/txt/msg01705.txt.bz2

On 05/19/2015 08:43 AM, Michael Matz wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Fri, 15 May 2015, Rich Felker wrote:
>
>> Forget lazy binding. It's dead anyway because serious distros want
>> PIE+relro+bindnow+...
>
> You keep saying this, but I can't help the feeling it's mostly because
> musl doesn't support it ;-)
FWIW, Red Hat is pushing PIE & partial RELRO deeper and deeper into the 
distribution.  It's not clear yet how far bindnow will go though.

jeff