From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 121123 invoked by alias); 27 May 2015 17:46:07 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 121114 invoked by uid 89); 27 May 2015 17:46:07 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KAM_LAZY_DOMAIN_SECURITY,SPF_HELO_PASS,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD autolearn=no version=3.3.2 X-HELO: mx1.redhat.com Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with (AES256-GCM-SHA384 encrypted) ESMTPS; Wed, 27 May 2015 17:46:06 +0000 Received: from int-mx14.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx14.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.27]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id t4RHk5AS022412 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=FAIL); Wed, 27 May 2015 13:46:05 -0400 Received: from localhost.localdomain (ovpn-113-175.phx2.redhat.com [10.3.113.175]) by int-mx14.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id t4RHk4lZ026977; Wed, 27 May 2015 13:46:05 -0400 Message-ID: <556602DC.1040804@redhat.com> Date: Wed, 27 May 2015 17:51:00 -0000 From: Jeff Law User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: John Marino , gcc-patches Subject: Re: [PATCH] Contribute FreeBSD unwind support (x86_64 and x86) References: <555CE558.5070404@marino.st> <5565EE05.90600@redhat.com> <5566024D.5010506@marino.st> In-Reply-To: <5566024D.5010506@marino.st> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2015-05/txt/msg02507.txt.bz2 On 05/27/2015 11:43 AM, John Marino wrote: > On 5/27/2015 18:17, Jeff Law wrote: >> Thanks for pointing that out. Otherwise I'd probably have asked the >> redundant question :-) >> >> Installed on the trunk. >> > > Thanks a lot, Jeff! Very painless this time. :) > > By the way, I can't see any reason why this couldn't be backported to > the gcc-5 branch as well. I don't know the procedure for that though. The procedure is pretty simple. Ask Richi, Jakub or Joseph for permission. They typically like to see patches on the trunk for a short period of time to help ensure there's no fallout. jeff