From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 27461 invoked by alias); 2 Jun 2015 14:00:45 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 27451 invoked by uid 89); 2 Jun 2015 14:00:44 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=0.1 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_50,KAM_LAZY_DOMAIN_SECURITY,SPF_HELO_PASS,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD autolearn=no version=3.3.2 X-HELO: mx1.redhat.com Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with (AES256-GCM-SHA384 encrypted) ESMTPS; Tue, 02 Jun 2015 14:00:43 +0000 Received: from int-mx13.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx13.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.26]) by mx1.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 26B5A19F973; Tue, 2 Jun 2015 14:00:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost.localdomain (ovpn-113-154.phx2.redhat.com [10.3.113.154]) by int-mx13.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id t52E0fvx011443; Tue, 2 Jun 2015 10:00:41 -0400 Message-ID: <556DB709.6010806@redhat.com> Date: Tue, 02 Jun 2015 14:11:00 -0000 From: Jeff Law User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.7.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: mliska , gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] Fix memory report layout at various places. References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2015-06/txt/msg00205.txt.bz2 On 06/01/2015 10:36 AM, mliska wrote: > gcc/ChangeLog: > > 2015-06-02 Martin Liska > > * alloc-pool.h (struct pool_usage): Correct space padding. > * ggc-page.c (ggc_print_statistics): Align columns in a report. > * mem-stats.h (struct mem_usage): Add argument to print_dash_line. > * tree.c (dump_tree_statistics): Align columns in a report. OK. I'm inclined to say that subsequent patches that do similar things should be considered pre-approved. Jeff