On 06/02/2015 03:58 PM, Jeff Law wrote: > On 06/01/2015 10:16 AM, mliska wrote: >> Hi. >> >> Following 2 patches improve memory statistics infrastructure. First one >> ports pool allocator to the new infrastructure. And the second one makes >> column alignment properly. >> >> Both can bootstrap on x86_64-linux-pc and survive regression tests. >> >> Ready for trunk? >> Thank you, >> Martin >> >> Port pool-allocator memory stats to a new infrastructure. >> >> gcc/ChangeLog: >> >> 2015-06-02 Martin Liska >> >> * alloc-pool.c (allocate_pool_descriptor): Remove. >> (struct pool_output_info): Likewise. >> (print_alloc_pool_statistics): Likewise. >> (dump_alloc_pool_statistics): Likewise. >> * alloc-pool.h (struct pool_usage): New struct. >> (pool_allocator::initialize): Change usage of memory statistics >> to a new interface. >> (pool_allocator::release): Likewise. >> (pool_allocator::allocate): Likewise. >> (pool_allocator::remove): Likewise. >> * mem-stats-traits.h (enum mem_alloc_origin): Add new enum value >> for a pool allocator. >> * mem-stats.h (struct mem_location): Add new ctor. >> (struct mem_usage): Add counter for number of >> instances. >> (mem_alloc_description::register_descriptor): New overload of >> the function. > - > >> diff --git a/gcc/alloc-pool.h b/gcc/alloc-pool.h >> index 96a1342..a1727ce 100644 >> --- a/gcc/alloc-pool.h >> +++ b/gcc/alloc-pool.h > >> + /* Dump usage coupled to LOC location, where TOTAL is sum of all rows. */ >> + inline void dump (mem_location *loc, mem_usage &total) const >> + { >> + char s[4096]; >> + sprintf (s, "%s:%i (%s)", loc->get_trimmed_filename (), >> + loc->m_line, loc->m_function); > Static sized buffer used in a sprintf where the strings are potentially user controlled. Not good, even in dumping code, still not good. > >> + >> + s[48] = '\0'; > ?!? Presumably you're just truncating the output line here for the subsequent fprintf call. Consider using a const with a symbolic name rather than the magic "48". I say "consider" because there's magic constants all over the place in the dumping code. So it may not be worth the effort. Your call. > > + >> + /* Dump header with NAME. */ >> + static inline void dump_header (const char *name) >> + { >> + fprintf (stderr, "%-32s%-48s %6s%11s%16s%17s%12s\n", "Pool name", name, >> + "Pools", "Leak", "Peak", "Times", "Elt size"); >> + print_dash_line (); >> + } >> + >> + /* Dump footer. */ >> + inline void dump_footer () >> + { >> + print_dash_line (); >> + fprintf (stderr, "%s%75li%10li\n", "Total", (long)m_instances, >> + (long)m_allocated); >> + print_dash_line (); >> + } > Note the header is static inline, footer is just inline. Please try to make them consistent. > > @@ -235,10 +301,10 @@ pool_allocator::release () >> free (block); >> } >> >> - if (GATHER_STATISTICS && false) >> + if (GATHER_STATISTICS) >> { >> - alloc_pool_descriptor *desc = allocate_pool_descriptor (m_name); >> - desc->current -= (m_elts_allocated - m_elts_free) * m_elt_size; >> + pool_allocator_usage.release_instance_overhead (this, >> + (m_elts_allocated - m_elts_free) * m_elt_size); > Looks like line wrapping needs to be fixed. > > > Clearly the biggest issue is that static sized buffer used to hold the results of sprintf... Once that and the smaller issues are fixed, this is OK. > > jeff > Hi Jeff. This patch improves the patch in suggested way. I verified it by valgrind that the allocated string buffer is used correctly. Ready for trunk? Thanks, Martin