Re: Fix 61347 testcase in alternative modes

Re: Fix 61347 testcase in alternative modes

[François Dumont]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 881 bytes --]

On 01/06/2015 22:09, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
> On 01/06/15 22:04 +0200, François Dumont wrote:
>> Hi
>>
>>    I can't find how to fix 61347 for alternative modes. I started 
>> with debug mode by providing a forward declaration for safe iterator 
>> type which return to the __distance on normal iterator but gcc still 
>> doesn't consider it as a builtin constant.
>>
>>    I guess the problem might come from compilations options, so is it 
>> that we should simply add a dg-require-normal-mode to have this test 
>> unsupported ? Otherwise any advise to fix this test ?
>
> Making it unsupported is OK. It's only testing that an optimisation
> works, but it's OK if it only works in normal mode that's fine.
>
Attached patch applied then.

2015-06-03  François Dumont  fdumont@gcc.gnu.org>

     * testsuite/23_containers/list/61347.cc: Add dg-require-normal-mode.

François


[-- Attachment #2: 61347.patch --]
[-- Type: text/x-patch, Size: 403 bytes --]

Index: testsuite/23_containers/list/61347.cc
===================================================================
--- testsuite/23_containers/list/61347.cc	(revision 224099)
+++ testsuite/23_containers/list/61347.cc	(working copy)
@@ -1,4 +1,5 @@
 // { dg-options "-std=gnu++11 -O2 -D_GLIBCXX_USE_CXX11_ABI" }
+// { dg-require-normal-mode "" }
 
 // Copyright (C) 2015 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
 //