public inbox for gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [PATCH] [PATCH][ARM] Fix thumb-ltu.c testcase.
@ 2015-06-01  9:49 Alex Velenko
  2015-06-01  9:50 ` Ramana Radhakrishnan
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Alex Velenko @ 2015-06-01  9:49 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-patches; +Cc: Ramana.Radhakrishnan

Hi,

This patch fix thumb-ltu.c to pass excess error test.
Without default -std=gnu90 flag, this testcase started failing
as some functions were called before being predefined.

Is patch ok?

gcc/testsuite

2015-06-01  Alex Velenko  <Alex.Velenko@arm.com>

        * gcc.target/arm/thumb-ltu.c (foo): Predefined.
        (bar): Predefined.
---
 gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/arm/thumb-ltu.c | 3 +++
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)

diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/arm/thumb-ltu.c b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/arm/thumb-ltu.c
index d057ea3..124b025 100644
--- a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/arm/thumb-ltu.c
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/arm/thumb-ltu.c
@@ -2,6 +2,9 @@
 /* { dg-require-effective-target arm_thumb1_ok } */
 /* { dg-options "-mcpu=arm1136jf-s -mthumb -O2" } */
 
+int foo();
+int bar();
+
 void f(unsigned a, unsigned b, unsigned c, unsigned d)
 {
   if (a <= b || c > d)
-- 
1.8.1.2

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] [PATCH][ARM] Fix thumb-ltu.c testcase.
  2015-06-01  9:49 [PATCH] [PATCH][ARM] Fix thumb-ltu.c testcase Alex Velenko
@ 2015-06-01  9:50 ` Ramana Radhakrishnan
  2015-06-04 12:55   ` Alex Velenko
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Ramana Radhakrishnan @ 2015-06-01  9:50 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Alex Velenko, gcc-patches



On 01/06/15 10:48, Alex Velenko wrote:
> Hi,
>
> This patch fix thumb-ltu.c to pass excess error test.
> Without default -std=gnu90 flag, this testcase started failing
> as some functions were called before being predefined.
>
> Is patch ok?
>
> gcc/testsuite
>
> 2015-06-01  Alex Velenko  <Alex.Velenko@arm.com>
>
>          * gcc.target/arm/thumb-ltu.c (foo): Predefined.
>          (bar): Predefined.
> ---
>   gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/arm/thumb-ltu.c | 3 +++
>   1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/arm/thumb-ltu.c b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/arm/thumb-ltu.c
> index d057ea3..124b025 100644
> --- a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/arm/thumb-ltu.c
> +++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/arm/thumb-ltu.c
> @@ -2,6 +2,9 @@
>   /* { dg-require-effective-target arm_thumb1_ok } */
>   /* { dg-options "-mcpu=arm1136jf-s -mthumb -O2" } */
>
> +int foo();
> +int bar();
> +

Surely this is,


extern int foo (void);
extern int bar (void);

>   void f(unsigned a, unsigned b, unsigned c, unsigned d)
>   {
>     if (a <= b || c > d)
>


OK with that change.

Ramana

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* Re: Re: [PATCH] [PATCH][ARM] Fix thumb-ltu.c testcase.
  2015-06-01  9:50 ` Ramana Radhakrishnan
@ 2015-06-04 12:55   ` Alex Velenko
  2015-06-04 13:08     ` Ramana Radhakrishnan
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Alex Velenko @ 2015-06-04 12:55 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Ramana Radhakrishnan, gcc-patches

On 01/06/15 10:50, Ramana Radhakrishnan wrote:
>
>
> On 01/06/15 10:48, Alex Velenko wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> This patch fix thumb-ltu.c to pass excess error test.
>> Without default -std=gnu90 flag, this testcase started failing
>> as some functions were called before being predefined.
>>
>> Is patch ok?
>>
>> gcc/testsuite
>>
>> 2015-06-01  Alex Velenko  <Alex.Velenko@arm.com>
>>
>>          * gcc.target/arm/thumb-ltu.c (foo): Predefined.
>>          (bar): Predefined.
>> ---
>>   gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/arm/thumb-ltu.c | 3 +++
>>   1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/arm/thumb-ltu.c
>> b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/arm/thumb-ltu.c
>> index d057ea3..124b025 100644
>> --- a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/arm/thumb-ltu.c
>> +++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/arm/thumb-ltu.c
>> @@ -2,6 +2,9 @@
>>   /* { dg-require-effective-target arm_thumb1_ok } */
>>   /* { dg-options "-mcpu=arm1136jf-s -mthumb -O2" } */
>>
>> +int foo();
>> +int bar();
>> +
>
> Surely this is,
>
>
> extern int foo (void);
> extern int bar (void);
>
>>   void f(unsigned a, unsigned b, unsigned c, unsigned d)
>>   {
>>     if (a <= b || c > d)
>>
>
>
> OK with that change.
>
> Ramana
>
Committed with said change r223982.
Is patch ok for fsf-5 backport?
Alex

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] [PATCH][ARM] Fix thumb-ltu.c testcase.
  2015-06-04 12:55   ` Alex Velenko
@ 2015-06-04 13:08     ` Ramana Radhakrishnan
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Ramana Radhakrishnan @ 2015-06-04 13:08 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Alex Velenko, gcc-patches


>>
> Committed with said change r223982.
> Is patch ok for fsf-5 backport?
> Alex
>

OK if no regressions.

Ramana

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2015-06-04 12:55 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2015-06-01  9:49 [PATCH] [PATCH][ARM] Fix thumb-ltu.c testcase Alex Velenko
2015-06-01  9:50 ` Ramana Radhakrishnan
2015-06-04 12:55   ` Alex Velenko
2015-06-04 13:08     ` Ramana Radhakrishnan

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).