From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 52773 invoked by alias); 8 Jun 2015 15:41:34 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 52735 invoked by uid 89); 8 Jun 2015 15:41:33 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-2.4 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_05,SPF_PASS,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 X-HELO: aserp1040.oracle.com Received: from aserp1040.oracle.com (HELO aserp1040.oracle.com) (141.146.126.69) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with (AES256-GCM-SHA384 encrypted) ESMTPS; Mon, 08 Jun 2015 15:41:32 +0000 Received: from userv0021.oracle.com (userv0021.oracle.com [156.151.31.71]) by aserp1040.oracle.com (Sentrion-MTA-4.3.2/Sentrion-MTA-4.3.2) with ESMTP id t58FfSI8015653 (version=TLSv1 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Mon, 8 Jun 2015 15:41:29 GMT Received: from userv0121.oracle.com (userv0121.oracle.com [156.151.31.72]) by userv0021.oracle.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id t58FfSmK011875 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Mon, 8 Jun 2015 15:41:28 GMT Received: from abhmp0016.oracle.com (abhmp0016.oracle.com [141.146.116.22]) by userv0121.oracle.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id t58FfS1G003897; Mon, 8 Jun 2015 15:41:28 GMT Received: from [192.168.1.4] (/79.17.73.34) by default (Oracle Beehive Gateway v4.0) with ESMTP ; Mon, 08 Jun 2015 08:41:28 -0700 Message-ID: <5575B7A5.3070108@oracle.com> Date: Mon, 08 Jun 2015 15:53:00 -0000 From: Paolo Carlini User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.7.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org" CC: Jason Merrill Subject: [Ping] [C++ Patch] PR 65815 References: <555F7971.4060704@oracle.com> In-Reply-To: <555F7971.4060704@oracle.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2015-06/txt/msg00595.txt.bz2 Hi, gently pinging this... On 05/22/2015 08:46 PM, Paolo Carlini wrote: > Hi, > > surprisingly, for NSDMIs we don't use reshape_init and we end-up > rejecting simple testcases like the below. It seems clear to me that > we should - consistently with the comment preceding digest_init too - > but I'm not 100% sure that digest_nsdmi_init is the best place for > that. Anyway, the below passes testing on x86_64-linux. https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2015-05/msg02158.html Thanks! Paolo.