From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from hamza.pair.com (hamza.pair.com [209.68.5.143]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 51013385828E for ; Tue, 5 Jul 2022 11:02:02 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 sourceware.org 51013385828E Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=pfeifer.com Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=pfeifer.com Received: from hamza.pair.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by hamza.pair.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A4D6933E1B; Tue, 5 Jul 2022 07:02:01 -0400 (EDT) Received: from naga.home (193-83-133-123.adsl.highway.telekom.at [193.83.133.123]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by hamza.pair.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id A8B9033E13; Tue, 5 Jul 2022 07:02:00 -0400 (EDT) Date: Tue, 5 Jul 2022 13:01:59 +0200 (CEST) From: Gerald Pfeifer To: Xi Ruoyao cc: GCC Patches , Richard Biener , Chenghua Xu , Weining Lu , Wang Xuerui Subject: Re: [PATCH][wwwdocs] gcc-12/changes.html: document LoongArch -m{no-,}check-zero-division default change for 12.2 In-Reply-To: <84f4760821fd274af517f28aa0ae122ef426dbb9.camel@xry111.site> Message-ID: <557fe908-9fb0-c15f-930a-07a32f1437ff@pfeifer.com> References: <84f4760821fd274af517f28aa0ae122ef426dbb9.camel@xry111.site> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, KAM_DMARC_STATUS, KAM_NUMSUBJECT, SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS, TXREP, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on server2.sourceware.org X-BeenThere: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Gcc-patches mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 05 Jul 2022 11:02:05 -0000 On Mon, 4 Jul 2022, Xi Ruoyao wrote: > Document a behavior change in r12-8546. Ok for wwwdocs? Thanks also for including the GCC 12.2 bug query as part of this. :) Gerald