From: Nathan Sidwell <nathan@codesourcery.com>
To: Marek Polacek <polacek@redhat.com>
Cc: GCC Patches <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>
Subject: Re: [gomp4] Remove some ptxness from middle end
Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2015 20:50:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5588659E.8050909@codesourcery.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150622170449.GL10139@redhat.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 418 bytes --]
On 06/22/15 13:04, Marek Polacek wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 22, 2015 at 01:00:51PM -0400, Nathan Sidwell wrote:
>> + if (GET_CODE (arg) != CONST_INT
>> + || (unsigned HOST_WIDE_INT)INTVAL (arg) >= OACC_HWM)
>
> Don't we have UINTVAL for this? So UINTVAL (arg).
Applied the attached, after testing. Also realized I'd missed some places I
should have used the new loop level enumeration.
nathan
--
Nathan Sidwell
[-- Attachment #2: cleanup.patch --]
[-- Type: text/x-patch, Size: 1998 bytes --]
2015-06-22 Nathan Sidwell <nathan@codesourcery.com>
* omp-low.c (expand_oacc_get_num_threads): Use OACC enum.
(expand_oacc_get_thread_num, make_predication_test): Likewise.
* builtins.c (expand_oacc_id): Use UINTVAL.
Index: omp-low.c
===================================================================
--- omp-low.c (revision 224747)
+++ omp-low.c (working copy)
@@ -4994,8 +4994,8 @@ expand_oacc_get_num_threads (gimple_seq
tree decl = builtin_decl_explicit (BUILT_IN_GOACC_NID);
unsigned ix;
- for (ix = 0; (1 << ix) <= gwv_bits; ix++)
- if ((1 << ix) & gwv_bits)
+ for (ix = OACC_gang; ix != OACC_HWM; ix++)
+ if (OACC_LOOP_MASK(ix) & gwv_bits)
{
tree arg = build_int_cst (unsigned_type_node, ix);
tree count = create_tmp_var (unsigned_type_node);
@@ -5022,8 +5022,8 @@ expand_oacc_get_thread_num (gimple_seq *
unsigned ix;
/* Start at gang level, and examine relevant dimension indices. */
- for (ix = 0; (1 << ix) <= gwv_bits; ix++)
- if ((1 << ix) & gwv_bits)
+ for (ix = OACC_gang; ix != OACC_HWM; ix++)
+ if (OACC_LOOP_MASK (ix) & gwv_bits)
{
tree arg = build_int_cst (unsigned_type_node, ix);
@@ -10671,7 +10671,7 @@ make_predication_test (edge true_edge, b
unsigned ix;
for (ix = OACC_worker; ix <= OACC_vector; ix++)
- if (mask & (1 << ix))
+ if (OACC_LOOP_MASK (ix) & mask)
{
gimple call = gimple_build_call
(decl, 1, build_int_cst (unsigned_type_node, ix));
Index: builtins.c
===================================================================
--- builtins.c (revision 224747)
+++ builtins.c (working copy)
@@ -5971,8 +5971,7 @@ expand_oacc_id (enum built_in_function f
rtx arg;
arg = expand_normal (arg0);
- if (GET_CODE (arg) != CONST_INT
- || (unsigned HOST_WIDE_INT)INTVAL (arg) >= OACC_HWM)
+ if (GET_CODE (arg) != CONST_INT || UINTVAL (arg) >= OACC_HWM)
{
error ("argument to %D must be constant in range 0 to %d",
get_callee_fndecl (exp), OACC_HWM - 1);
prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-06-22 19:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-06-22 17:04 Nathan Sidwell
2015-06-22 17:04 ` Marek Polacek
2015-06-22 17:10 ` Nathan Sidwell
2015-06-22 20:50 ` Nathan Sidwell [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5588659E.8050909@codesourcery.com \
--to=nathan@codesourcery.com \
--cc=gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org \
--cc=polacek@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).