public inbox for gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "François Dumont" <frs.dumont@gmail.com>
To: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely@redhat.com>
Cc: "libstdc++@gcc.gnu.org" <libstdc++@gcc.gnu.org>,
	 gcc-patches <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>
Subject: Re: Do not take address of empty string front
Date: Wed, 24 Jun 2015 20:17:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <558B0F7D.6010405@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150622151000.GI2856@redhat.com>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1873 bytes --]

On 22/06/2015 17:10, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
> On 20/06/15 12:59 +0100, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
>> On 20/06/15 12:03 +0200, François Dumont wrote:
>>> Hi
>>>
>>>   2 experimental tests are failing in debug mode because
>>> __do_str_codecvt is sometimes taking address of string front() and
>>> back() even if empty. It wasn't use so not a big issue but it still
>>> seems better to avoid. I propose to rather use string begin() to get
>>> buffer address.
>>
>> But derefencing begin() is still undefined for an empty string.
>> Shouldn't that fail for debug mode too?
It would if we were using basic_string debug implementation but we
aren't. We are just using normal implementation with some debug checks
which is not enough to detect invalid deference operations.
>> Why change one form of
>> undefined behaviour that we diagnose to another form that we don't
>> diagnose?
>>
>> It would be better if that function didn't do any work when the input
>> range is empty:
>>
>> --- a/libstdc++-v3/include/bits/locale_conv.h
>> +++ b/libstdc++-v3/include/bits/locale_conv.h
>> @@ -58,6 +58,12 @@ _GLIBCXX_BEGIN_NAMESPACE_VERSION
>>                    _OutStr& __outstr, const _Codecvt& __cvt, _State&
>> __state,
>>                    size_t& __count, _Fn __fn)
>>    {
>> +      if (__first == __last)
>> +       {
>> +         __outstr.clear();
>> +         return true;
>> +       }
>> +
>>      size_t __outchars = 0;
>>      auto __next = __first;
>>      const auto __maxlen = __cvt.max_length() + 1;
>
> This makes that change, and also moves wstring_convert into the
> ABI-tagged __cxx11 namespace, and fixes a copy&paste error in the
> exception thrown from wbuffer_convert.
>
> Tested powerpc64le-linux, committed to trunk.
>
> François, your changes to add extra checks in std::string are still
> useful separately.
>
I just applied attached patch then.

François

[-- Attachment #2: string.patch --]
[-- Type: text/x-patch, Size: 3029 bytes --]

Index: include/bits/basic_string.h
===================================================================
--- include/bits/basic_string.h	(revision 224914)
+++ include/bits/basic_string.h	(working copy)
@@ -39,6 +39,7 @@
 #include <ext/atomicity.h>
 #include <ext/alloc_traits.h>
 #include <debug/debug.h>
+
 #if __cplusplus >= 201103L
 #include <initializer_list>
 #endif
@@ -903,7 +904,10 @@
        */
       reference
       front() noexcept
-      { return operator[](0); }
+      {
+	_GLIBCXX_DEBUG_ASSERT(!empty());
+	return operator[](0);
+      }
 
       /**
        *  Returns a read-only (constant) reference to the data at the first
@@ -911,7 +915,10 @@
        */
       const_reference
       front() const noexcept
-      { return operator[](0); }
+      {
+	_GLIBCXX_DEBUG_ASSERT(!empty());
+	return operator[](0);
+      }
 
       /**
        *  Returns a read/write reference to the data at the last
@@ -919,7 +926,10 @@
        */
       reference
       back() noexcept
-      { return operator[](this->size() - 1); }
+      {
+	_GLIBCXX_DEBUG_ASSERT(!empty());
+	return operator[](this->size() - 1);
+      }
 
       /**
        *  Returns a read-only (constant) reference to the data at the
@@ -927,7 +937,10 @@
        */
       const_reference
       back() const noexcept
-      { return operator[](this->size() - 1); }
+      {
+	_GLIBCXX_DEBUG_ASSERT(!empty());
+	return operator[](this->size() - 1);
+      }
 #endif
 
       // Modifiers:
@@ -1506,7 +1519,10 @@
        */
       void
       pop_back() noexcept
-      { _M_erase(size()-1, 1); }
+      {
+	_GLIBCXX_DEBUG_ASSERT(!empty());
+	_M_erase(size() - 1, 1);
+      }
 #endif // C++11
 
       /**
@@ -3308,7 +3324,10 @@
        */
       reference
       front()
-      { return operator[](0); }
+      {
+	_GLIBCXX_DEBUG_ASSERT(!empty());
+	return operator[](0);
+      }
 
       /**
        *  Returns a read-only (constant) reference to the data at the first
@@ -3316,7 +3335,10 @@
        */
       const_reference
       front() const _GLIBCXX_NOEXCEPT
-      { return operator[](0); }
+      {
+	_GLIBCXX_DEBUG_ASSERT(!empty());
+	return operator[](0);
+      }
 
       /**
        *  Returns a read/write reference to the data at the last
@@ -3324,7 +3346,10 @@
        */
       reference
       back()
-      { return operator[](this->size() - 1); }
+      {
+	_GLIBCXX_DEBUG_ASSERT(!empty());
+	return operator[](this->size() - 1);
+      }
 
       /**
        *  Returns a read-only (constant) reference to the data at the
@@ -3332,7 +3357,10 @@
        */
       const_reference
       back() const _GLIBCXX_NOEXCEPT
-      { return operator[](this->size() - 1); }
+      {
+	_GLIBCXX_DEBUG_ASSERT(!empty());
+	return operator[](this->size() - 1);
+      }
 #endif
 
       // Modifiers:
@@ -3819,7 +3847,10 @@
        */
       void
       pop_back() // FIXME C++11: should be noexcept.
-      { erase(size()-1, 1); }
+      {
+	_GLIBCXX_DEBUG_ASSERT(!empty());
+	erase(size() - 1, 1);
+      }
 #endif // C++11
 
       /**

  parent reply	other threads:[~2015-06-24 20:14 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-06-20 10:47 François Dumont
2015-06-20 20:38 ` Jonathan Wakely
2015-06-22 15:11   ` Jonathan Wakely
2015-06-23 20:09     ` François Dumont
2015-06-25 18:27       ` Jonathan Wakely
2015-06-24 20:17     ` François Dumont [this message]
2015-07-02 22:54     ` Jonathan Wakely

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=558B0F7D.6010405@gmail.com \
    --to=frs.dumont@gmail.com \
    --cc=gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=jwakely@redhat.com \
    --cc=libstdc++@gcc.gnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).